MAYOR PUTS CITY ON PATH TO REPLACING BROKEN PLACARD SYSTEM

Stickers & scanable license plates will eventually replace often abused parking placards; City will roll out new technology, stiff penalties & dedicated enforcement that will help to eliminate fake placards, and a strict three-strike revocation policy for placard misuse

  Mayor de Blasio today announced the next steps in his plan to tackle fake placards and the first steps towards a digital parking management system to replace physical placards by 2021. This new plan builds on the Mayor’s 2017 placard crackdown, which led to a 93% increase in summonses for illegal parking in 2018 from the 2016 baseline. The Mayor aims to phase out the use of physical city-issued placards throughout the city in 2021 and eliminate the use of fraudulent placards. This will be accomplished with an increase in penalties, a strict three-strike policy for misusing a placard, culminating in revocation, and dedicated DOT placard enforcement unit. At the same time, a new census of placard misuse will provide groundbreaking data to measure our progress and inform the public. The Mayor is also committed to working with the Council on placard abuse.

“Placard abuse erodes faith in government and has no place in our city – it’s simply a question of fairness,” said Mayor de Blasio. “Misused and fraudulent placards increase congestion and pose a public safety risk. These initiatives give us the tools we need to start making a real dent in this pervasive issue, to help build a fairer city for all.”

“DOT looks forward to playing a key role in helping combat placard abuse, including moving towards a digital placard system and strengthening targeted enforcement,” said DOT Commissioner Polly Trottenberg. “These initiatives are important steps towards a better regulated placard system and better curb management citywide.”

“This new initiative will help ensure our City streets are kept clear and that privileges are not abused,” saidNYPD Chief of Transportation Thomas Chan. “While NYPD enforcement of placard abuse has increased 93% from 2016 to 2018, this problem persists and we will continue working closely with our partners at the Department of Transportation on this critical effort.”

Moving Towards Digital Parking Management System

Pending the results of DOT’s Placard Sticker pilot, stickers will be used to replace DOT-issued placards by the end of 2019 as a bridge towards the Pay by Plate System. The Pay by Plate system will fully phase out all city-issued physical placards by 2021.

Pilot Program for Placard Stickers: DOT is currently conducting a pilot program that replaces paper placards with window stickers on 300 DOT owned vehicles. By making it impossible to move an official placard to a different vehicle, the sticker program will eliminate a significant aspect of placard misuse. Replacing placards with stickers is also a key stepping stone towards a fully virtual permit system, and this sticker system will provide a bridge until the pay-by-plate system is fully implemented. Results from the pilot expected summer 2019.

Pay by Plate: DOT and NYPD will roll out a state-of-the-art parking management system. An integrated parking management system will eventually link parking meters, hand held enforcement devices and license plates. This parking management system will ultimately say if a car is in violation of parking and placard rules, further automating parking enforcement. Government employees that have authorization to park at certain places and times, which are currently identified with a parking placard, will have those stipulations attached to a license plate that will automatically register as legally or illegally parked—eliminating discretion and confusion in placard enforcement. It will cost $52 million for installation and new equipment, and the first edition of this modernized system, focused on pay-by-plate meters, will be fully operational by 2021.

Stiff Penalties & Dedicated Enforcement

Strict Three Strikes Policy: Through DOT and DOF rulemaking, the city will create a strict three-strike policy that will lead to permanent revocation for misusing an official placard three times. This rule would make misuse or fraudulent use an additional, separate violation on top of a parking violation. This rule will be in place by spring of 2019. In addition, the Mayor will advocate for changes to State law to raise the penalty for a placard violation from $50 to $250.

Dedicated Enforcement: DOT will create a new team of 10 Traffic Enforcement Agents dedicated to targeted enforcement of placard rules.  This dedicated team will focus on particular hot spots in Lower Manhattan or Downtown Brooklyn, the two areas most plagued by placard abuse.  Working with NYPD, DOT will hire, train and acquire the equipment for this team within one year.  They will be empowered to ticket vehicles abusing their placard privileges or using fake placards. As DOT undertakes this initiative, we will also evaluate its effectiveness and potential next steps, including focusing on other hot spots for placard abuse.  

Tracking Illegal Placards: The Mayor’s SCOUT team will conduct an annual survey on the rate of illegal placard use in key hotspots throughout the City, to create a baseline of data to track the progress of the placard plan.

In 2018, there were roughly 125,500 city-issued placards. DOT issued 50,000, NYPD issued 44,000 and DOE issued 31,500. This total number does not include state or federal placards. Since the 2017 announcement, there has been a 93% increase in NYPD summons for illegal parking while displaying a placard from the 2016 baseline. There were 28,269 summons in 2016, 41,931 in 2017 and 54,608 in 2018.

“Placard abuse and associated corruptive practices, such as blocking sidewalks and bus and bike lanes, are inexcusable. It’s the City of New York’s responsibility to hold whomever is at fault, accountable. I’ve worked on this issue for many years and I hope this bill package recently introduced by the Council along with the Mayor’s initiative introduced today will stop the illegal use of placards,” said Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez, Chair of the Transportation Committee.

Wave Hill events March 7‒14

Sat, March 9

Family Art Project: Patch it Up—Nature Heals

Be inspired by nature’s ability to heal. To spark your creative juices, look to the forest that heals itself, starfish that regenerate limbs and trees that pump sugar to their sick tree-neighbors. Create patches by making stamps from upcycled styrofoam, then pin them on your favorite jacket or iron them onto clothes that need some love. Free, and admission to the grounds is free until noon.

Wave Hill House, 10AM–1PM

Sun, March 10

Spring Birding

Welcome migratory birds back to Wave Hill this spring. Explore the gardens and woodlands with naturalist Gabriel Willow on a quest to spot both resident and rare birds as they pass through on their northern journey or settle down for the season. Severe weather cancels. Ages 10 and older welcome with an adult. Free with admission to the grounds. NYC Audubon Members enjoy two-for-one admission.

Meet at Perkins Visitor Center, 9:30AM

Sun, March 10

Family Art Project: Patch it Up—Nature Heals

Be inspired by nature’s ability to heal. To spark your creative juices, look to the forest that heals itself, starfish that regenerate limbs and trees that pump sugar to their sick tree-neighbors. Create patches by making stamps from upcycled styrofoam, then pin them on your favorite jacket or iron them onto clothes that need some love. Free with admission to the grounds.

Wave Hill House, 10AM–1PM

Sun, March 10

Winter Workspace Art Workshop: Eco Prints

Take a tour of Liene Bosquê’s Winter Workspace studio and view the work she has created onsite. Learn about the dyeing and printing techniques she uses and explore working with eco dyes and cyanotype. Materials included. All levels welcome. Ages 12 and up welcome with an adult. $55; Wave Hill Members save 10%. Registration required, online at wavehill.org or at the Perkins Visitor Center.

Meet at Glyndor Gallery, 10AM–1PM

Sun, March 10

Family Nature Walk

Join naturalist and educator Gabriel Willow on a family-friendly walk through the gardens or woodlands. Ages five and older welcome with an adult. Severe weather cancels. Free with admission to the grounds.

Meet at Wave Hill House, 1PM

Sun, March 10

Winter Workspace Drop-in

Artists in the Winter Workspace program share their studio practice with visitors on this Drop-In Sunday. Free with admission to the grounds.

Glyndor Gallery, 1–3PM

Sun, March 10

Garden and Conservatory Highlights Walk

Join a Wave Hill Garden Guide for an hour-long tour of seasonal garden highlights. Free with admission to the grounds.

Meet at Perkins Visitor Center, 2PM

Mon, March 11

Closed to the public.

A 28-acre public garden and cultural center overlooking the Hudson River  and Palisades, Wave Hill’s mission is to celebrate the artistry and legacy of its gardens and landscape, to preserve its magnificent views, and to explore human connections to the natural world through programs in horticulture, education and the arts.

HOURS – Open all year, Tuesday through Sunday and many major holidays: 9AM–4:30PM,  November 1–March 14. Closes 5:30PM, starting March 15.

ADMISSION – $10 adults, $6 students and seniors 65+, $4 children 6–18. Free Saturday and Tuesday mornings until noon. Free to Wave Hill Members and children under 6.

PROGRAM FEES – Programs are free with admission to the grounds unless otherwise noted.

Visitors to Wave Hill can take advantage of Metro-North’s one-day getaway offer. Purchase a discount round-trip rail far and discount admission to the gardens. More at http://mta.info/mnr/html/getaways/outbound_wavehill.htm

  

DIRECTIONS – Getting here is easy! Located only 30 minutes from midtown Manhattan, Wave Hill’s free shuttle van transports you to and from our front gate and Metro-North’s Riverdale station, as well as the W. 242nd Street stop on the #1 subway line. Limited onsite parking is available for $8 per vehicle. Free offsite parking is available nearby with continuous, complimentary shuttle service to and from the offsite lot and our front gate. Complete directions and shuttle bus schedule at www.wavehill.org/visit/.

Information at 718.549.3200. On the web at www.wavehill.org.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces $5.3 Million Proposed Settlement Of Lawsuit Against New York City For Fraudulently Obtaining FEMA Funds Following Superstorm Sandy

 Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Mark Tasky, Special Agent in Charge of the New York Regional Office of the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (“DHS-OIG”), and Margaret Garnett, Commissioner, New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”), announced today that the United States filed a civil fraud lawsuit today against the CITY OF NEW YORK (the “City”) alleging that the NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (“NYCDOT”) fraudulently obtained millions of dollars from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) by falsely claiming that numerous NYCDOT vehicles were damaged during Superstorm Sandy (“Sandy”).  The United States also submitted a proposed settlement of the lawsuit to the U.S. District Court for review and approval.  Under the proposed settlement, the City agreed to pay and revert to the United States a total of $5,303,624 and admitted to conduct alleged in the Government’s complaint, including seeking reimbursement from FEMA for vehicles that were not damaged by Sandy.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “FEMA serves a critical role in providing emergency relief to those who are tragically struck by disaster.  When people lie to FEMA about the cause of property damage in order to reap a windfall, it compromises FEMA’s ability to provide financial assistance to legitimate disaster victims in desperate need.  This Office will take decisive enforcement action to protect FEMA and its vital programs from fraud, waste, and abuse.”

DHS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Mark Tasky said:  “Taking advantage of Federal funds intended for disaster relief misappropriates taxpayer dollars, reduces funds available to true victims, and erodes public confidence in relief efforts. Through DHS OIG’s criminal and civil investigative oversight function of DHS programs, and working closely with our partners in the New York City’s Department of Investigation and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, we ensured that over $5.3 million in disaster relief funds were repaid to the United States, and ultimately the U.S. taxpayer. With so many New York residents impacted by Superstorm Sandy, it is critical to ensure every dollar of appropriated relief funds are properly used and accounted for.”

DOI Commissioner Margaret Garnett said:  “Today’s settlement is the successful outcome of a joint investigation with our federal partners, which uncovered falsified submissions by the City to the federal government that allowed the City to wrongly obtain millions of dollars in federal emergency funds.  Our investigation found that a lack of vigilant management and inadequate training of City personnel at the City Department of Transportation led to this wrongdoing in connection with a federal public assistance program.  As New York City’s independent watchdog, DOI is grateful for our effective partnership with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York and the New York Regional Office of the United States Department of Homeland Security Office of the Inspector General on this investigation.”

According to the Government’s Complaint, the City participated in FEMA’s Public Assistance program, which allows municipalities to obtain indemnification funds from FEMA to repair or replace property damaged by natural disasters, such as Sandy.  As part of the program, the City was required to certify that the property damage was incurred as a direct result of the disaster.  The City was also required to provide training to employees on program rules and requirements, including the importance of ensuring that costs for which indemnification is sought are directly attributable to a disaster.

Following Sandy, the NYCDOT created a list of vehicles within the agency’s fleet that had been damaged by the storm and submitted it to FEMA for indemnification pursuant to the Public Assistance program.  The NYCDOT personnel responsible for generating the list of damaged vehicles, to whom the City provided no training on the Public Assistance program, made no effort to inspect the vehicles or otherwise determine whether any reported damage was attributable to Sandy.  In fact, a number of the vehicles included on this list were inoperable long before Sandy.

In 2014, based on this faulty list, the City submitted a request for indemnification to FEMA seeking to recover the full cost of replacing 132 NYCDOT vehicles.  The City submitted a certification to FEMA as part of the program and a request for indemnification that falsely attested that all costs were incurred as a direct result of Sandy.  Many of the vehicles for which the City sought full replacement costs had been nonoperational or not in use prior to the storm.  As a result of these false certifications, FEMA paid the City millions of dollars to which it was not entitled.

As part of the proposed settlement, the City will pay the United States a total of $5,303,624.  Specifically, the City will make a cash payment of $4,126,227.34 and relinquish rights to an additional $1,177,396.66 that FEMA had previously approved for disbursement.  During this Office’s investigation, the City withdrew another $3,196,376 in indemnity requests, acknowledging that the costs were ineligible for reimbursement.

In connection with the proposed settlement, the City also admitted conduct alleged in the Complaint, including:

• The Deputy Commissioner from NYCDOT who signed the certification lacked personal knowledge about the vehicles sufficient to make a certification about how and when they were damaged and did not personally undertake or direct others to undertake any investigation of the vehicles prior to signing the certification.
   
• The list of vehicles for which the City was seeking reimbursement included a number of vehicles that were not damaged as a direct result of Sandy to a state beyond repair.  A number of the vehicles that the City included had not been operational prior to Sandy.
   
• Prior to making the submission and certification to FEMA, neither the City nor NYCDOT undertook a sufficient review to ascertain whether all of the vehicles listed had been operational and in use prior to Sandy; or whether the amounts presented to FEMA for reimbursement accurately represented the losses the City incurred from Sandy.
   
• In June 2014, a NYCDOT employee notified the Deputy Commissioner that certain of the vehicles for which the City had sought reimbursement from FEMA were not eligible. Yet, it was not until after it became aware of this Office’s investigation that the City took steps to notify FEMA.

The proposed settlement must be approved by the District Court.

Mr. Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of DHS-OIG and DOI.  

Attorney General James Announces Settlement With Star Exemption Advisor For Scamming Thousands Of Homeowners Seeking Property Tax Rebates

STAR Exemption Advisor and Owner Arie Gal Charged Homeowners for Simply Forwarding Basic STAR Exemption Applications To Nassau County Assessor’s Office 

 Attorney General Letitia James announced a settlement with STAR Exemption Advisor, YCA Corp. and its business owner Arie Gal for scamming thousands of new homeowners by charging them excessive fees to enroll in the Basic STAR Exemption Program, which is otherwise free.   

“Taking advantage of New Yorkers by manipulating a tax exemption program created to help homeowners is illegal and immoral,” said Attorney General Letitia James. “We should be doing all we can to support homeowners, not prey upon them and steal their hard-earned savings. This settlement is a continued reminder that my office will pursue any individual who tries to deceive New Yorkers.”  

Terms of the settlement include $920,000 in damages, the dissolution of STAR Exemption and YCA Corp, the recision of all consumer contracts with STAR Exemption, the cancelation of all outstanding billed/unbilled accounts, the permanent barring from offering any property tax rebate services in the State of New York, and the vacating of all small claims court judgments. 

The New York State School Tax Relief (“STAR”) Program provides a partial exemption from school property taxes for primary residences that are owner-occupied with a total household income of $500,000 or less. To receive the exemption, new homeowners must file an application with their local assessor’s office by January 2 each year in order for the exemption to be applied to the upcoming and subsequent years’ tax bills.  

The Attorney General’s office sued following its investigation of Mr. Gal and his business after receiving numerous complaints from homeowners who alleged that his company had substantially overcharged them for filing an otherwise free application that the homeowners had completed themselves. The Supreme Court of Nassau County found Gal and his business liable for fraudulent and deceptive business practices and false advertising, as homeowners were unaware that they were doing business with a private company, since they believed they were sending their Nassau County application forms to the County, not an intermediary.  

Mr. Gal used an official-sounding name like “Star Exemption Advisor” to scam thousands of homeowners out of tax savings that rightfully belonged to them. His company sent misleading mailers that looked like official government agency documents, tricking homeowners into signing up with them to apply for the Basic STAR exemption for a fee. The respondents used official-looking envelopes to make homeowners think that the mailers were coming from a government agency. Moreover, the company charged homeowners an exorbitant fee that was 100 percent of the total tax savings for the first year, even though applying for the Basic STAR exemption costs nothing and can be accomplished without professional help.  

Once homeowners were approved for the exemption, the company sent them invoices. If payment was not remitted immediately or homeowners disputed the charges, Mr. Gal sued them in Small Claims Court. Mr. Gal even sued homeowners for applications the homeowners had personally filed with the Department of Assessment. Upon receiving a Small Claims Court notice from Mr. Gal, most homeowners settled to avoid litigation. Homeowners who went to their scheduled court date were shocked to see so many other homeowners in the same predicament.  

Attorney General James Announces Restitution And Penalty Payments From Multiple Energy Service Companies For Consumer Fraud

Energy Plus Issued $700,000 in Payments to Current and Former Customers Following a 2017 Settlement 

Ambit Energy Required to Change Practices and Pay $1.5 Million in Penalties for Deceptive Practices

   New York Attorney General Letitia James announced that refund checks are being issued to consumers of Energy Plus Holdings LLC and Energy Plus Natural Gas LLC (collectively, “Energy Plus”) as a result of a 2017 settlement with the Office of the Attorney General. Attorney General James also announced a settlement with Ambit Energy Holdings, LLC, Ambit Marketing, LLC and Ambit New York, LLC (collectively, “Ambit”). Both engaged in deceptive practices that resulted in consumers paying more for energy services when they were promised savings. 

“Thousands of New Yorkers will get their money back after they were deceived into paying for more expensive energy services,” said Attorney General Letitia James. “Energy Plus and Ambit are just two of the multiple unscrupulous energy service companies that the Attorney General’s Office has challenged in our ongoing effort to protect consumers. We have zero tolerance for companies seeking to defraud New Yorkers out of their hard-earned money.”  

Over $700,000 in payments are being distributed to eligible current and former customers of Energy Plus stemming from a 2017 settlement with the Office of the Attorney General. As part of its investigation, the Office found that the company engaged in a number of deceptive practices that resulted in consumers paying more for their energy service than they would have paid to their local utilities.   

In particular, the investigation found that Energy Plus: 

• Lured consumers with false promises of savings, then swindled them into paying much higher bills;   
• Failed to disclose material terms such as conditions for receiving cash back;  
• Deceptively implied that cancellations could be processed immediately.    

The Better Business Bureau Serving Metropolitan New York administered the Attorney General’s restitution program based on claims submitted by consumers who were Energy Plus customers prior to the settlement. Approximately 2,800 residential consumers and small businesses will receive payments.  

The payment distribution for Energy Plus customers comes on the heels of a settlement the Office of the Attorney General reached in December with another ESCO - Ambit Energy Holdings, LLC, Ambit Marketing, LLC and Ambit New York, LLC (collectively, “Ambit”). Ambit’s settlement, which resulted in a $1.5 million penalty, stemmed from an investigation that found that Ambit: 

• Misrepresented that consumers would achieve savings;   
• Signed up consumers with Ambit without their consent;   
• Switched consumers to a more expensive energy plan without adequate notice;   
• Promised its marketers high incomes that were not generally achieved.   

Because Ambit previously agreed to provide more than $20 million in refunds to its customers in a class action settlement, the Attorney General did not seek restitution in that case. 

The Attorney General’s settlements also required Energy Plus and Ambit to take measures to prevent deceptive practices in the future, including adequate training of customer service representatives, refraining from misleading advertising about savings, and implementing appropriate disciplinary procedures for violations of the law.  

Energy service companies (or “ESCOs”) often purchase energy on the open market and then sell it to consumers. Utilities still deliver the energy to consumers, but consumers can choose to purchase their energy directly from the utility or through an ESCO.  The Attorney General’s ongoing investigation into ESCOs has returned more than $5 million to consumers, including nearly $2 million to customers of Columbia Utilities Power LLC and more than $1 million to customers of HIKO Energy, LLC.    

Consumers can protect themselves from unscrupulous ESCOs by remembering the following tips:  

• If you receive an offer for energy services, make sure you understand whether the offer is from your utility or an ESCO.  
•  You do not have to choose an ESCO to supply your gas or electricity. You may choose to use your utility as your direct supplier.  
• Make sure you understand whether an ESCO contract involves an early termination fee and, if so, the fee amount and the length of your contract commitment.  
• Before accepting any offer, ask the ESCO to show you how its rates have compared with your utility’s rates during each month in the past year. This can help you judge how competitive the ESCO’s rates may be in the future.  
• Remember that you have the right to cancel an ESCO contract with no obligation within three days if you change your mind.  
•  If you are uncomfortable with how a marketer behaves, end the conversation with a request to look over their offer in writing so you can get back to them when you have made a decision free of any pressure.  
• If you receive a notice that your service is being switched to an ESCO and you did not authorize the switch, contact the utility and the ESCO immediately to tell them to halt the switch. If you are unable to get an ESCO switch cancelled, contact the New York Public Service Commission at 1-888-697-7728.  

FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF BAYCHESTER YOUTH COUNCIL SENTENCED FOR STEALING FEDERAL FUNDS

Earnestine Russell Stole Thousands of Dollars Meant For Middle-School Children

 Bronx District Attorney Darcel D. Clark today announced that Earnestine Russell, a former, longtime director of a Bronx youth group, has been sentenced after pleading guilty to Grand Larceny. 

 District Attorney Clark said, “The defendant stole money that was meant to support after school programs for middle school children in our Bronx community. The defendant, who led the Baychester Youth Council since the 1980s, has now been held accountable for her actions.” 

 New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli said, “Earnestine Russell took public money intended to give children a safe and nurturing place to go after school, but spent it on personal trips and electronic equipment for herself. I thank Bronx County District Attorney Clark for working with us to hold Ms. Russell accountable.”

 District Attorney Clark said that Russell, 69, of 1930 Schieffelin Avenue, pleaded guilty today to third-degree Grand Larceny and was sentenced by Bronx Supreme Court Justice Robert Neary to one year in jail with a $61,098.00 order of restitution by civil judgment. The defendant also waived her right to appeal.

 According to the investigation by the Bronx District Attorney’s Office and the State Comptroller’s Office, Russell stole money from a federally funded grant administered by the New York State Education Department between December 19, 2009 and July 7, 2011.

 District Attorney Clark thanked Comptroller DiNapoli's Division of Investigations and Bureau of State Expenditures, and the New York State Police.

FIRST BRONX INDICTMENT UNDER ‘SEX TRAFFICKING OF A CHILD’ LAW

Bronx Man Allegedly Brought 14-Year-Old Girl to Motel for Sex With “John;” Authorities Rescued Teen At Motel After She Was Reported Missing

  Bronx District Attorney Darcel D. Clark today announced that a Bronx man has been charged under the new state law of Sex Trafficking of a Child for allegedly promoting the prostitution of a 14-year-old girl. 

 District Attorney Clark said, “The defendant allegedly discussed pricing and received money for the prostitution of a 14-year-old girl who had been reported missing by her mother. This is the first Bronx case charging Sex Trafficking of a Child, a law which better reflects the realities of sexual exploitation of youngsters. This indictment makes clear that our office takes these cases very seriously.” 

 District Attorney Clark said the defendant, George Hinton, 27, of 3635 Bronxwood Avenue, was arraigned today on Sex Trafficking of a Child; first-degree, second-degree, third-degree and fourth-degree Promoting Prostitution; and Endangering the Welfare of a Child before Bronx Supreme Court Justice George Villegas. Bail was continued at $250,000 cash/$250,000 bond and the defendant is due back in court on May 15, 2019. 

 According to the investigation, the girl was reported missing in late December 2018, and the Federal Human Trafficking Task Force and the NYPD’s Bronx Vice Squad began a joint operation to find her. An Undercover NYPD Officer, posing as a John, contacted a phone number associated with the defendant and during the phone conversation, the defendant allegedly told the Undercover Officer that he would have to pay $100 for 30 minutes of sexual intercourse. They arranged to meet at the El Rancho Motel at 3701 White Plains Road. On the night of January 4, 2019, in front of the motel, the Undercover Officer was greeted by Hinton, who was with the young victim. After the Undercover paid $100, the defendant was arrested inside the motel lobby and the girl was rescued.

 District Attorney Clark thanked Detective Bekim Vucetaj, Detective Adrian Ramos, and Sergeant Donald Gannon, all of the Bronx Vice Squad, for their work on the case. District Attorney Clark thanked her Detective Investigator Jennifer Garcia, and Assistant District Attorney Stephen Knoepfler, Supervisor in the Criminal Enterprise Bureau, as well as Assistant District Attorney Jacqueline Wood and Trial Prep Assistant Davewin Meade, also of the Criminal Enterprise Bureau, for their assistance in the case. 

An indictment is an accusatory instrument and not proof of a defendant’s guilt

Woodlawn Town Hall Meeting by Dinowitz, Biaggi, Cohen, and Engel

  A Woodlawn Town Hall meeting with elected officials Councilman Andrew Cohen, State Senator Alessandra Biaggi, Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz, and Congressman Eliot Engels went smoothly until there was a question about recently passed state legislation called the Reproductive Health Act. The RHA now allows for a fetus to be aborted much closer to the time of birth than before, which was part of the Progressive agenda by Governor Andrew Cuomo and the new Democratic controlled State Senate. 

  Abortion has long been a controversial point to many, especially in conservative areas such as Woodlawn. When the question came up State Senator Biaggi tried to explain the new law, but a woman then a man stood up to shout her down about killing babies now. For a short period of time Senator Biaggi had to stop as the pair kept interrupting her. Senator Biaggi was finally allowed to finish her comments, and then a well prepared Assemblyman Dinowitz read five points which he said was the new law. After that the Town Hall meeting returned to normal with local issues written on cards being read by Assemblyman Dinowitz's Chief of Staff Ms. Randi Martos. 

  Other questions were about the new LED street lights, local parks, immigration, schools, traffic, other new legislation recently passed in Albany, taxes, land use matters, and the upcoming state budget. 

Above - State Senator Alessandra Biaggi talking about the Reproductive Health Act.

Below - A woman holding a video tape of an abortion, and a man holding a bible kept interrupting Senator Biaggi claiming that babies would be aborted right before they were to be born. Senator Biaggi had to wait until their outbursts were over to continue.

Above - Assemblyman Dinowitz a veteran of many Town Hall meeting came well prepared as he spoke about the five points of the new Reproductive Health Act, and other topics that were asked.

Below - While most questions did not require an answer from Congressman Engel, his Chief of Staff Bill Weitz was well equipped to answer a question about immigration.