A QUESTION TO NYC'S SO-CALLED PROGRESSIVE LEADERS

 By Councilman Rev. Ruben Diaz

You should know that the Progressive Democratic leaders in NYC, proclaim that they exist to protect the minority community predominately (Blacks and Hispanics). The “Progressives” claims that their efforts, protests, demonstrations are supposedly geared to assist People of Color move up the ladder by obtaining prestigious positions. According to the “Progressive” argument, we the people of color, have been for decades faced with discrimination, racism, and continue to be oppressed, with no hope of meeting our aspirations and getting a piece of the “equality” pie. The "Progressives" have created various movements to help realize their agenda, like the "Women’s Liberation Movement" the "Me to Movement", " The Woman’s Right To Choose, have Equal Pay and Job Opportunities". For Black Americans now the outcry is the movement for "Reparation’s " and the very powerful movement of "Black Lives Matter". They have also taught the concept of “White Privilege”. This is a movement that proclaims that Whites have special privileges due to the color of their skin.   It is important for you to know that among the candidates for the next NYC elections’ there are three (3) African American candidates, (1) Hispanic candidate and (4) women seeking to become the next Mayor of the City of New York. These candidates are Brooklyn’s county President, Mr. Erick Adams, Mr. Ray McGuire, Ms. Maya Wiley, Ms. Diana Morales, Ms. Katherine García, and Ms. Loree Sutton.  These candidates are all well qualified to occupy the position of Mayor for the greatest City in the world. I imagine that after all the protests, struggles, rioting, arrests, demonstrations and constant outcries from the so-called leaders of these “Progressive” movements, they would be ready to support a member of the minority community, or to have the first woman occupy Gracie Mansion.  You would think, that right? But NO! Life has its Surprises, Surprises come in life! You should know that the “Progressive” leaders are lining up behind Comptroller Scott Stringer’s candidacy for Mayor. Wait! What? Say it isn’t so. Some women when they seek or run for certain positions stand on the argument of equal opportunities for women. They criticize and attack others for not supporting them, claiming that the lack of support is due to their female gender. Those very same women, surprisingly, now ignore the women that aspiring to become our first female mayor and would prefer to throw their support behind Scott Stringer, going against four qualified women. Moreover, what can we say about the large number of Black African American leaders, who have forgotten about the Black Community, and the chants that "Black Lives Matter", and have ignored the qualifications, of candidates like Erik Adams, Ray McGuire, Maya Wiley, and Diane Morales, and have decided to back City Comptroller Scott Stringer. This leads me to ask the “Progressives” the following questions, what happened? What happened with the Black Lives Matters Movement? Where are the aspirations to finally have the first female Mayor of New York? What happened with the outcry of white privilege that is being taught to our Black and Brown children in Public Schools? It is important to remind everyone that I am a Conservative Democrat, and that as a minister, The, senior Pastor of the Christian Community Neighborhood Church, and as the President of the New York Hispanic Clergy Organization, I have always proclaimed and fought for Christian biblical values. In this regard, I have supported and will always support those candidates who are closest to our principles, regardless of race or political parties. I’m clear on my positions But to New York City’s Progressive leadership I am compelled to ask: Why are you now supporting Scott Stringer against the, very qualified, African-Americans, Hispanics and women candidates for Mayor?  What happened now? What happened to the first woman Mayor of New York City? What happened to the nipping White Privilege in the bud?   That being said! Once again, I have to emphasize that this is in no way my agenda. I don’t point this out because I am in support of the Progressive agenda. As I said before, I am a Conservative Democrat. But I don’t know what’s going on with the so-called Progressive Movement who, with their actions, are sending a message to Black Americans, Hispanic Americans and women “Sorry but it is not your time; you must wait for your time to come."  I am Councilman Rev. Rubén Diaz, and this is What You Should Know.

Bus Only Lane Repainted on Pelham Parkway East Again.

 

Every few months the painted Bus Only Lanes have to be repainted. In the past there was a truck that sprayed a thin layer of new paint over the Bus Only Lane to identify that the lane was for buses only. Saturday there was a different system used to repaint the Bus Only Lane on Pelham Parkway East. Traffic was down to one lane Eastbound as two lanes were closed for the painting. Several men were in a truck pumping the orange paint from a large drum into small buckets. 

This time instead of a thin spray the paint was poured out by the bucket across the lane. Men then spread the paint across the lane, while others with rollers at the end of long sticks rolled over the paint to even it out. Blue tape was placed around the 'Bus Lane Only' markings in the lane so they would not get painted over. I was told this paint job would last up to three years. We will see how long it lasts from the rain and road salt that goes on it. 

 

Above - The truck with the drums of paint that are put into little buckets. One such empty paint drum is dropped from the truck. 

Below - Paint is poured onto the lane one bucket at a time. The almost unpainted Bus Only Lane can be seen in the background.

Above - This worker has to go back to get another bucket of paint to spread out on the lane as the paint he poured out is spread across the lane.

Below - The paint is then rolled out carefully as not to cover the taped off area in the lane marked 'Bus Lane Only'.

Saturday Clean Up In Poe Park

 

Saturday was Clean Up Poe Park day for State Senator Gustavo Rivera and Congressman Adriano Espaillat. Poe Park is located on the Grand Concourse at East 192nd street, and over a dozen others joined the state senator and congressman, including 15th City council candidates Elisa Crespo and Oswald Felez.

State Senator Rivera did not want me to take a photo of the used syringe he picked up among the leaves, but did not say not to mention what is too often found in Poe Park, that being a used syringe. The clean up of the block long park went well with seven bags of trash filled. The Parks Department was on hand to provide trash pickers, rakes, brooms, and trash bags for the clean up.

Above - State Senator Gustavo Rivera bends down to pick up a used syringe.

Below - Congressman Adriano Espaillat knows how to use a trash picker as he deposits this piece of trash into the waiting trash bag.

Above - The volunteers stand behind the full trash bags and other trash that was picked up by the Parks Department.

Below - (L-R) 15th City Council candidate Elisa Crespo, Community Activist Jose Padilla.

Governor Cuomo Updates New Yorkers on State's Progress During COVID-19 Pandemic

 

0.99 of Yesterday's COVID-19 Tests were Positive; 37th Straight Day with Infection Rate Below 1 Percent

6 COVID-19 Deaths in New York State Yesterday

SLA and State Police Task Force Visits 1,543 Establishments; Observes 10 Establishments Not in Compliance

Confirms 725 Additional Coronavirus Cases in New York State - Bringing Statewide Total to 444,365; New Cases in 42 Counties

  Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today updated New Yorkers on the state's progress during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Yesterday's infection rate of 0.99 percent marked the 37th straight day that the rate has remained below one percent. The number of new cases, percentage of tests that were positive and many other helpful data points are always available at forward.ny.gov.

"Our numbers continue to reflect the work of New Yorkers, who ultimately flattened the curve," Governor Cuomo said. "For 37 days, our infection rate has remained below one percent, which is incredible when you think back to where we were in the spring. As we head into the fall and flu season ahead, we need everyone to continue to wear masks, socially distance and wash their hands, and above all, stay New York tough."

Yesterday, the State Liquor Authority and State Police Task Force visited 1,543 establishments in New York City and Long Island and observed 10 establishments that were not in compliance with state requirements. A county breakdown of yesterday's observed violations is below:

• Bronx - 4
• Brooklyn- 1
• Queens - 1
• Suffolk - 4

Today's data is summarized briefly below:

• Patient Hospitalization - 464 (-3)
• Patients Newly Admitted - 57
• Hospital Counties - 33
• Number ICU - 131 (+4)
• Number ICU with Intubation - 54 (+3)
• Total Discharges - 75,767 (+60)
• Deaths - 6
• Total Deaths - 25,390

Governor Cuomo Announces New Record-High Number of COVID-19 Tests Reported to New York State

 

102,925 Test Results Reported to New York State Yesterday

0.82 Percent of Yesterday's COVID-19 Tests were Positive; 36thStraight Day with Infection Rate Below 1 Percent

New York State Has Distributed 6 Million Bottles of NYS Clean Hand Sanitizer

2 COVID-19 Deaths in New York State Yesterday; No Deaths Reported in NYC

SLA and State Police Task Force Visits 1,359 Establishments; Observes 4 Establishments Not in Compliance

Confirms 849 Additional Coronavirus Cases in New York State - Bringing Statewide Total to 443,640; New Cases in 50 Counties

  Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced a new record-high number of test results—102,925—were reported to New York State yesterday. Yesterday's infection rate of 0.82 percent marked the 36th straight day that it has been below 1 percent. No deaths were reported in New York City yesterday. The number of new cases, percentage of tests that were positive and many other helpful data points are always available at forward.ny.gov. 

"Testing is a cornerstone of our efforts to keep New Yorkers safe from COVID-19. The more testing you do, the more accurate a picture of the virus' spread you have," Governor Cuomo said. "Yesterday's record-high number of tests helps the state make informed decisions to protect the welfare of New Yorkers, and helps them make informed decisions for themselves. But testing alone isn't enough, and we need residents to continue to wear masks, socially distance and wash their hands. We will get out on the other side of this together, but in the meantime we have to stay New York Tough."

The governor also announced that New York State has distributed 6 million bottles of NYS Clean hand sanitizer. Throughout the pandemic, hand sanitizer has been provided at no charge to healthcare facilities, government agencies, food banks, schools, colleges, public housing, public transportation, prisons, first responders, frontline workers, and houses of worship, among others.

Yesterday, the State Liquor Authority and State Police Task Force visited 1,359 establishments in New York City and Long Island and observed 4 establishments that were not in compliance with state requirements. A county breakdown of yesterday's observed violations is below:

• Brooklyn - 1 
• Staten Island - 1 
• Nassau - 1 
• Suffolk - 1

Today's data is summarized briefly below: 

• Patient Hospitalization - 467 (-7)
• Patients Newly Admitted - 58 
• Hospital Counties - 34
• Number ICU - 127 (+7)
• Number ICU with Intubation - 51 (-3)
• Total Discharges - 75,707 (+58)

Comptroller Stringer, State Senator Liu, and Assemblymember Rozic Call on the City to Implement Green Roofs Tax Abatement and Spur Development of Green Roofs Across the City

 

Urge executive order to kickstart program to incentivize building green roofs in areas of the City suffering from lack of green space, intense heat, or sewer overflows

Tax abatement would generate green jobs and mitigate ongoing environmental and health inequities that put low-income communities and communities of color at risk

Every dollar invested in green roofs is estimated to generate two to three dollars in societal return

  New York City Comptroller Scott M. Stringer joined with State Senator John Liu and Assemblymember Nily Rozic to send a letter to Mayor de Blasio calling on the City to implement the Green Roofs Tax Abatement and catalyze the development of green roofs across the city. Comptroller Stringer, State Senator Liu and Assembymember Rozic urged Mayor de Blasio to sign an executive order authorizing the Mayor’s Office of Sustainability to implement the new Green Roof Tax Abatement and to designate high-need areas for green roof installation. The Green Roofs Tax Abatement, sponsored by State Senator Liu and Assemblymember Rozic and signed into law by Governor Cuomo, stems from recommendations made in 2018 by Comptroller Stringer and Danielle Spiegel-Feld, a professor at New York University Law School.

“As we continue to tackle our public health crisis and grapple with the economic fallout of COVID-19, we must remember we’re still in the midst of the climate crisis. We can’t postpone our climate fight until after the pandemic — we have to use every tool at our disposal right now to take it on,” said Comptroller Stringer. “Every dollar invested in green roofs reaps double or triple in societal returns and pays major public health and environmental dividends in communities on the frontlines of climate change. Green roofs cut energy costs and carbon emissions, mitigate flooding, insulate buildings, and cool entire neighborhoods. We have to seize every opportunity to work towards a cleaner, greener future.”

“The green roofs tax abatement program is a small yet smart investment in green infrastructure that will reap huge benefits for New York City,” said State Senator Liu. “Though we are facing many challenges these days, fighting climate change must remain a top priority. Letting the green roofs program wither on the vine is short-sighted and would do a disservice to the outerborough communities who most need the jobs, the green space, and the societal and financial benefits that come with an investment in green infrastructure. The Mayor must prove his commitment to creating a sustainable future for NYC by signing an executive order to activate this program without delay.”

“When we renewed the City’s Green Roof Tax Abatement Program, we knew it was integral to investing in green infrastructure and addressing the realities of climate change in our communities,” said Assemblymember Rozic. “To delay its implementation any further denies our most vulnerable neighborhoods the opportunity to reap many benefits amidst an environmental and public health crisis.”

The new Green Roof Tax Abatement incentivizes the construction of green roofs by tripling the tax abatement in areas of the city that are particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The program, now capped at $1 million per year, would drive the development and retention of green infrastructure jobs that will form a critical part of the City’s economic recovery as well as mitigate ongoing environmental and health inequities that put low-income communities and communities of color at risk. Furthermore, the Comptroller underscores that every dollar invested in green roofs is estimated to generate an estimated two to three dollars in societal return.

The letter highlights several advantages of green roofs, including absorbing stormwater, reducing runoff by more than 50 percent and averting combined sewer overflows and localized flooding, insulating buildings, cutting energy use and associated carbon emissions, and mitigating the urban heat island effect that imperils seniors and other residents susceptible to heat stress. Green roofs keep individual rooftops 30 to 40 degrees cooler than conventional roofs and can help lower temperatures across entire neighborhoods, and can even be turned into community space for New Yorkers to enjoy the outdoors.

The Green Roofs Tax Abatement was restructured and reauthorized last year with the goal of catalyzing the development of green roofs across the City’s 62 square miles of roof space. According to the Nature Conservancy, less than 0.1% of New York City’s one million buildings boast green roofs, and the bulk of existing green roofs are concentrated in Manhattan. The new abatement aims to offer an enhanced credit to areas most in need of critical green space and infrastructure, including communities like Eastern Queens, the South Bronx, Central Brooklyn, and other neighborhoods.

To read the full letter from Comptroller Stringer, State Senator Liu and Assembly member Rozic to Mayor de Blasio, click here.

Libertarian Party Visits the Bronx

Larry Sharpe, The Libertarian Party candidate for Governor of New York State in 2018, received 90,816 giving the Libertarian Party qualified party status, and automatic ballot access for the first time in the history of the party's existence. A minor party needed a minimum of 50,000 votes to become a recognized New York State party with an automatic ballot line. Warren Redilch in 2010 received only 48,386 votes, the most of any Libertarian Party candidate since the party's inception in 1971.

In talking with Mr. Sharpe, he said that he had taken a year and a half off without receiving any compensation in his bid for governor in 2018. He said that currently there are slightly over 13,000 members of the Libertarian Party of New York. He has traveled around the state to ask people to vote on the Libertarian Party line this year, because new ballot laws passed this year now require that minor parties receive a minimum of 130,000 votes each year, instead of 50,000 votes once every four years during the governors election year. 

A mix of the Democrats and Republicans was seen by the people who attended this dinner to meet Larry Sharpe in the Bronx. The Libertarian Party of New York is dedicated to the principle that free people have the right to do anything they please, except to initiate force, the threat of force, or fraud, against other persons or their property.

Above - Larry Sharpe explaining what he is doing to help the Libertarian Party maintain its current qualified party status in New York State.

Below - Libertarian Party candidate Oz Sultan (a registered Republican) for the 30th State Senate District tells why he chose to run on the Libertarian Party line.  

There were many questions for Larry Sharpe, including if he was going to run for governor in 2022, which he did not rule out.

Bridgeport Police Chief And Personnel Director Charged With Fraud, False Statements In Connection With City’s Hiring Of The Police Chief

 

Defendants Alleged to Have Rigged Police Chief Exam, Misappropriated City’s Confidential Information

  Audrey Strauss, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515, and David Sundberg, Special Agent-in-Charge, New Haven Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced the arrest of ARMANDO J. PEREZ, the Chief of Police of the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut (the “City”), and DAVID DUNN, the City’s acting personnel director, for defrauding the City by rigging the 2018 police chief examination, mandated by the City’s Charter, to ensure PEREZ would be selected for the position.  PEREZ and DUNN were also charged with making false statements to federal agents in the course of the investigation.  Both defendants are expected to appear before U.S. Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel in Bridgeport federal court this afternoon.

Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said:  “As alleged, Chief Perez and Personnel Director Dunn schemed to rig the purportedly impartial and objective search for a permanent police chief to ensure the position was awarded to Perez, and then repeatedly lied to federal agents in order to conceal their conduct.  Bridgeport’s citizens and police officers deserve leaders with integrity who are committed to enforcing, not breaking, the law, and we thank the FBI for their partnership in investigating and uncovering the scheme alleged.”   

FBI Special Agent-in-Charge David Sundberg said:  “I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the members of the United States Attorney’s Offices in both the Southern District of New York as well as Connecticut for their professionalism and invaluable assistance in this case. Today’s arrest of city officials including a high ranking, long-time law enforcement officer is a stark reminder that the betrayal of public trust and community members by a public servant is not only unethical but often illegal. We recognize these arrests are not a reflection on the Bridgeport Police Department as a whole, but it is our responsibility to root out injustice and corruption by any and all elected and appointed officials entrusted to protect and serve with honor. We at the FBI will continue to aggressively pursue all those engaged in matters of public corruption throughout Connecticut.”

According to the allegations contained in the Complaint unsealed upon the defendants’ arrest, and publicly available information:[1]

The Scheme to Rig the City of Bridgeport’s Police Chief Exam

The charges alleged in the Complaint arise from a criminal scheme to rig the City’s search for a new Bridgeport Police Department (“BPD”) chief in 2018.  During the course of this scheme, PEREZ – who was serving as the acting BPD chief at the time – conspired with DUNN, who is and was at that time the City’s acting personnel director, to deceive the City by secretly rigging the supposedly independent search process for a new BPD chief to ensure that PEREZ was ranked as one of the top three candidates and could therefore be awarded a five-year contract to serve as the BPD chief.

More specifically, in or about February 2018, the City commenced a search to fill the position of permanent Chief of Police.  Under the City’s Charter, the City was required to conduct an “open and competitive examination” to determine the top three scoring candidates for the position, from which the mayor could then choose.  DUNN, in his role as the personnel director, oversaw the police chief examination process, and retained an outside consultant (“Consultant-1”) to assist with developing and carrying out the exam.  DUNN and PEREZ then manipulated that examination process in multiple ways:  DUNN stole confidential examination questions and related information developed by Consultant-1, and provided those materials to PEREZ, including by email; DUNN had Consultant-1 tailor the examination scoring criteria to favor PEREZ; PEREZ enlisted two BPD officers to secretly draft and write PEREZ’s written exam; and DUNN attempted to influence a panelist, tasked with ranking the candidates in the last stage of the exam, to ensure that PEREZ was scored as one of the top three candidates. 

As a result of the scheme, the City was deceived into ranking PEREZ among the top three candidates, which rendered him eligible for the permanent police chief position.  The mayor ultimately offered the position to PEREZ, and the City, under the assurance that PEREZ had been appointed in accordance with the City Charter, entered into a five-year contract with PEREZ, the terms of which included a payout of more than $300,000 to PEREZ for accrued leave.

False Statements by PEREZ and DUNN

PEREZ and DUNN were each voluntarily interviewed in connection with the FBI’s investigation.  In an attempt to conceal their conduct, during those interviews they both lied to FBI agents about facts material to the criminal investigation.  PEREZ provided false and misleading information about the assistance DUNN and others had provided him in connection with the examination process, including his requests to a BPD officer to sneak into headquarters to retrieve stolen confidential information provided by DUNN.  DUNN falsely denied requesting an exam panelist ensure that PEREZ was scored as one of the top three candidates.

PEREZ, 64, of Trumbull, Connecticut, and DUNN, 72, of Stratford, Connecticut, are each charged with one count of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, each of which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. PEREZ is also charged with two counts of false statements to federal investigators, and DUNN is charged with one count of false statements to federal investigators, each of which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

The maximum potential sentences are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by a judge.

Ms. Strauss praised the outstanding work of the FBI and the Special Agents of the U.S. Attorney’s Office. 

The charges contained in the Complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

 [1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Complaint, and the description of the Complaint set forth herein, constitutes only allegations, and every fact described therein should be treated as an allegation.