Tuesday, February 18, 2020

Brooklyn Owner Of Durable Medical Equipment Companies Pleads Guilty To Participating In $9 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme


  Geoffrey S.  Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and William F. Sweeney Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced that GREG MILLER pled guilty today to participating in a $9 million scheme to defraud providers of “no-fault” insurance plans.  As part of the scheme, MILLER and his co-conspirators billed insurance companies millions of dollars for expensive durable medical equipment that was never provided to patients.  MILLER pled guilty before United States District Court Judge Katherine Polk Failla.     

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As he admitted in court today, Greg Miller exploited New York’s no-fault auto insurance system by billing millions of dollars for durable medical equipment that was never actually provided to patients, was medically unnecessary, or was far more expensive than the equipment that was provided.  Now Miller awaits sentencing for his crime.”
FBI Assistant Director William F. Sweeney Jr. said:  “When private health care programs are abused, the financial burden is typically passed on to consumers of these programs by way of increased premiums and other means of supporting services provided by the company.  This is in no way a victimless crime, as it translates into very real numbers for those who pay into these health care programs.  Miller’s conduct was just another way to make a quick profit at the expense of others, and this type of behavior can’t be tolerated.” 
As alleged in the Information filed today in Manhattan federal court:
Between 2014 and 2019, GREG MILLER employed other individuals to serve as the nominal owners of at least two durable medical equipment (“DME”) supply companies located in Brooklyn, New York.  MILLER, the true owner and operator of the companies, directed these individuals to submit fraudulent bills to private insurance companies that provided “no-fault” insurance plans.  Under New York State law, a company that insures a vehicle involved in an accident is required to provide reimbursement for certain treatments and services provided to the vehicle occupants, regardless of who was at fault in the accident.  These treatments and services may include DME if the DME is necessary and actually provided.  The bills submitted by MILLER’s companies were fraudulent because, among other things, the bills were for DME that was never provided to patients, for DME that was medically unnecessary, or for expensive DME purportedly provided to patients when the DME in fact provided to patients was inexpensive DME.        
MILLER, 60, pled guilty to one count of conspiring to commit health care fraud and faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison.
The maximum potential sentence in this case is prescribed by Congress and is provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.  As part of his plea, MILLER agreed to forfeit $3,698,010 and to pay at least that amount in restitution.
Mr. Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of FBI’s Healthcare Fraud Task Force.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces Guilty Plea Of U.S. Taxpayer In Panama Papers Investigation


  Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and Brian A. Benczkowski, Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, announced today that HARALD JOACHIM VON DER GOLTZ, a/k/a “H.J. von der Goltz,” “Johan von der Goltz,” “Jochen von der Goltz,” “Tica,” “Tika,” pled guilty today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses to wire fraud, tax fraud, money laundering, false statements, and other charges.  VON DER GOLTZ, a former U.S. resident and taxpayer, is charged along with Ramses Owens, Dirk Brauer, and Richard Gaffey, a/k/a “Dick Gaffey,” in connection with a decades-long criminal scheme perpetrated by Mossack Fonseca & Co. (“Mossack Fonseca”), a Panamanian-based global law firm, and its related entities. 

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “Harald Joachim von der Goltz went to extraordinary lengths to circumvent U.S. tax laws in order to maintain his wealth and hide it from the IRS.  Using the specialized criminal services of global law firm Mossack Fonseca, von der Goltz set up shell companies and off-shore accounts to conceal millions of dollars.  Now, after years of concealment from the United States, von der Goltz has admitted guilt in a U.S. court and awaits sentencing that could result in a term in a U.S. prison.”
AAG Brian A. Benczkowski said:  “Over nearly two decades, von der Goltz conspired to keep his income hidden from U.S. tax authorities and law enforcement.  Today’s guilty plea demonstrates the Department’s steadfast commitment to prosecute taxpayers who use offshore structures to obscure their wealth and evade their tax obligations.”According to the allegations contained in the Indictments[1], other filings in this case, and statements during court proceedings, including VON DER GOLTZ’s guilty plea hearing:
Since at least 2000 through 2017, VON DER GOLTZ conspired with others to conceal his assets and investments, and the income generated by those assets and investments, from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) through fraudulent, deceitful, and dishonest means.  During all relevant times, VON DER GOLTZ was a U.S. resident and was subject to U.S. tax laws, which required him to report and pay income tax on worldwide income, including income and capital gains generated in domestic and foreign bank accounts.  Nevertheless, VON DER GOLTZ evaded his tax reporting obligations by setting up a series of shell companies and bank accounts, and hiding his beneficial ownership of the shell companies and bank accounts from the IRS.  These shell companies and bank accounts made investments totaling tens of millions of dollars.  VON DER GOLTZ was assisted in this scheme through the use of Mossack Fonseca, including Ramses Owens, a Panamanian lawyer who previously worked at Mossack Fonseca, and by Richard Gaffey, a partner at a U.S.-based accounting firm.  Specifically, in furtherance of VON DER GOLTZ’s efforts to conceal his assets and income from the IRS, VON DER GOLTZ engaged the services of Mossack Fonseca, including Owens, to create a sham foundation and shell companies formed under the laws of Panama and the British Virgin Islands to conceal from the IRS and others the ownership by VON DER GOLTZ of accounts established at overseas banks, as well as the income generated in those accounts.  VON DER GOLTZ, Gaffey, and Owens also falsely claimed that VON DER GOLTZ’s elderly mother was the sole beneficial owner of the shell companies and bank accounts at issue because, at all relevant times, she was a Guatemalan citizen and resident, and – unlike VON DER GOLTZ – was not a U.S. taxpayer. 
VON DER GOLTZ, 82, a citizen of Germany and Guatemala who resided in Needham, Massachusetts, and Key Biscayne, Florida, pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit tax evasion, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison; one count of wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; one count of money laundering conspiracy, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison; four counts of willful failure to file Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, FINCEN Reports 114, each of which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison; and two counts of false statements, each of which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. 
VON DER GOLTZ is scheduled to appear before Judge Richard M. Berman on February 24, 2020, at 9:30 a.m., at which time it is anticipated Judge Berman will set a sentencing date.
The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentence for the defendant will be determined by the judge.
Gaffey is scheduled to proceed to trial on March 9, 2020, before Judge Berman. 
U.S. Attorney Berman praised the outstanding investigative work of IRS - Criminal Investigation and HSI, and thanked the Justice Department’s Tax Division and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for their significant assistance in the investigation.  Mr. Berman also thanked the Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs, which provided significant assistance in securing the defendant’s extradition from the United Kingdom.  He also thanked law enforcement partners in France, the United Kingdom, Panama, and Germany for their assistance in the case.
The charges as to Owens, Brauer, and Gaffey are merely accusations, and they are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
[1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the texts of the Indictments and the descriptions of the Indictments set forth herein constitute only allegations as to Owens, Brauer, and Gaffey, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.

Attorney General James Condemns Federal Proposals To Roll Back Critical Anti-Discrimination Protections For Patients And Students


   New York Attorney General Letitia James today sent two multistate comment letters to the Trump Administration, opposing federal proposals that roll back critical anti-discrimination protections for patients and students. Both proposals stem from President Trump’s Executive Order that allows faith-based organizations to deny services to various groups. In the first proposal, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would eliminate transparency requirements for faith-based providers that help patients to understand their rights and access referrals to care from alternative providers. In the second, the U.S. Department of Education is vastly expanding the definition used to claim a religious exemption under Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972. This would allow schools to discriminate on the basis of sex against students or faculty based on the moral beliefs and practices of administrators, even if those practices have no connection with a religion. Together, these federal proposals are part of the Trump Administration’s ongoing assault on the rights of women, survivors of sexual harassment and violence, and LGBTQ+ individuals.
“The president’s Executive Order is nothing more than a veiled attempt to discriminate against our nation’s patients, students, and those who are most vulnerable,” said Attorney General James. “Religion should never be used as weapon, yet the Trump Administration has repeatedly worked to pit Americans against each other by using faith as a wedge between us. Our coalition is fighting the president’s attempts to divide Americans along religious lines, and will continue to do everything in our power to protect women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those who need these valuable protections.”
In the first comment letter, the coalition of 23 attorneys general contends that HHS’ proposal fails to safeguard the rights of women and LGBTQ+ individuals — both groups which already disproportionately face barriers to care, particularly when it comes to obtaining accurate information about their health care and referrals. The receipt of accurate and impartial information from providers is vital to a patient’s health and could mean the difference between life and death. Under the proposal, faith-based providers will no longer be required to notify patients of their rights, including the right to a referral. For instance, removing notice and referral requirements will adversely impact a woman’s ability to access critical reproductive care, including an abortion. In fact, religiously-affiliated crisis pregnancy centers — which have seen an uptick in federal funding under the Trump Administration — have been known to offer patients misleading information in an attempt to discourage them from obtaining an abortion or accessing contraception. In the comment letter, the coalition maintains that HHS’ proposal is arbitrary and capricious because it fails to consider the evidence or adequately justify the proposed changes. 
In the second comment letter, the coalition of 20 attorneys general highlights how the Department of Education’s proposal to expand religious exemptions under Title IX could give schools free rein to discriminate against students or faculty on the basis of sex — significantly harming people who have suffered discrimination, including sexual harassment and violence. Currently, Title IX contains a narrow religious exemption for educational institutions controlled by a religious organization. The proposal would allow more schools to discriminate on the basis of sex by broadening the criteria for institutions to claim a religious exemption, such that even schools with a tenuous relationship with religion could claim exemption from Title IX requirements. As a result, under the proposal, a student could unlawfully face discrimination — for using birth control, being pregnant or parenting a child out of marriage, or for being LGBTQ+ — simply because of the moral beliefs or practices of school administrators. Sexual harassment and violence survivors could also be denied the protections of Title IX by schools claiming to be exempt under the proposed rule. This kind of discrimination can needlessly and seriously disrupt a student's academic trajectory and career and could have a detrimental long-term effect on their mental and physical health. The coalition also notes that the proposal is arbitrary and capricious because the federal government failed to provide any substantive reasoning that would justify this dramatic departure in policy, which is contrary to the goals of Title IX.

LIVE.     WORK.     SHOP.     THRIVE. 


Our trainings are free. These workshops address barriers for district small business owners and build robust equitable economic development tools. These tools help drive the systemic change needed to support equitable economic development in the Bronx, while also providing important information to avoid fines from increased government-imposed small business regulations.

NYS Plastic Bag Ban Info Session, Weds - February 26, 2020 - 5:00pm

Learn about the NYS Plastic Bag Ban and what steps you need to take to comply with the law.
The NYS Plastic Bag Ban goes into effect on March 1, 2020. All businesses should be aware of what they need to do to comply with this new law. The New York State Bag Waste Reduction Act prohibits the distribution of plastic carryout bags by retailers in New York state.

Businesses that are not exempt from the law are required to provide paper bags to consumers. Businesses must charge a 5 cent paper bag fee per bag. SNAP and WIC recipients are exempt from this fee. Businesses must show the transaction of the paper bags clearly on receipts and shall state the number of bags provided to the customer. The paper carryout bag reduction fee must be reported and paid to the state commissioner of taxation and finance on a quarterly basis.

Learn more about this ban and what you need to do during this information session hosted by the Third Avenue Business Improvement District and NYC Department of Sanitation.



Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez Opens Bronx Campaign Office





Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez kicking off her re-election bid, opened her Bronx campaign office on Saturday February 15th. The address is 1371 Herschell Street just off Westchester Avenue. This location seems to be the middle of the Bronx part of the 14th Congressional District. To the East is Throggs Neck, Pelham, and Country Club. To the West is Parkchester and Castle Hill. To the North is Morris Park, Van Nest, and Pelham Parkway.

  The campaign office is divided into different sections where different activities can take place. After she wins re-election Congresswoman Ocassio-Cortez intends to turn the campaign office into a community space for meetings and educating people how to help themselves, and others. The lease is for five years so it looks like Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez intends to stick around. One thing however, in 2021 there will be redistricting, and with the possible loss of two congressional seats for New York no one can predict what Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez's district will look like for her race in 2022. 


Above - AOC chats with one of the many volunteers.
Below - The volunteers wanted selfies with Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez.



There are two community meetings with Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasia-Cortez Wednesday February 19th at PS 304 2759 Lafayette Avenue in the Throggs Neck area from 7:30 - 9 PM.
Thursday February 20th at Janell Towers 801 Neill Avenue in the Morris Park area from 7:30 - 9 PM.

Contact OcasioCortez.com/events  to sign up for these and other events including petitioning beginning Tuesday February 25th at various locations listed. You must be a registered voter in New York State, and a member of the Democratic Party to collect petition signatures.

Bronx Fashion Week Returns 2/.29./2020 At the Bay Plaza Mall


flyer 15 flyer 15

Saturday, February 15, 2020

13 Defendants Charged With Submitting Millions Of Dollars In False Transportation Claims To Medicaid


  Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Peter C. Fitzhugh, Special Agent in Charge of the New York Field Office of the Department of Homeland Security Investigations (“HSI”), Scott J. Lampert, Special Agent in Charge of the New York Regional Office of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (“HHS-OIG”), and Dennis Rosen, New York State Medicaid Inspector General (“OMIG”), announced the unsealing of a Complaint charging thirteen defendants with participating in a scheme to steal millions of dollars from New York State’s Medicaid program through fraudulent claims related to transportation services.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said:  “As alleged, these defendants exploited and abused Medicaid, billing millions of dollars for phantom medical transportation services.  Medicaid is intended to provide financial assistance to those in need.  These defendants allegedly treated the Medicaid program that pays for medical transport as an opportunity to steal from Medicaid, which is indirectly stealing from American taxpayers.  Now they face prosecution for their alleged crimes.”
HSI Special Agent in Charge Peter C. Fitzhugh said:  “It is alleged that these individuals schemed to defraud the Medicaid program out of millions of dollars, in turn robbing all those who rely on it for their vital healthcare needs.  More than a dozen were involved in this plan to charge for services not rendered, and HSI working with its law enforcement partners arrested those who sought to make a profit at the expense of those in need and will continue to do so.”
HHS-OIG Special Agent in Charge Scott J. Lampert said:  “Millions of people in New York depend on Medicaid for vital services, and taxpayers across the country pay for that care.  We will continue close cooperation with our State and Federal law enforcement partners to preserve this essential funding.”
NYS Medicaid Inspector General Dennis Rosen said:  “Today’s arrests send an unmistakable message to those who seek personal gain by preying upon vulnerable New Yorkers and exploiting the Medicaid program.  My office will continue to work closely with our federal partners to protect Medicaid recipients, save taxpayer dollars, and hold wrongdoers fully accountable.”
As alleged in the criminal Complaint unsealed today:[1] 
From in or about August 2017 to February 2020, KJ Transportation C Services Inc. (“KJ”) was paid more than $20 million for providing transportation services for Medicaid enrollees in the New York City area.
JORGELINA ABREU GIL, 32, of Yonkers, New York, is the owner of KJ.  Her husband, JULIO ALVARADO, 59, of Yonkers, is a manager at the company.  Beginning in August 2017, KJ began submitting claims to Medicaid for purported medical transportation services for eligible people in the New York area.  From August 2017 to February 2020, KJ submitted more than 100,000 claims related to hundreds of thousands of trips.  However, a large percentage of those claims were fraudulent.  In some instances, the Medicaid recipient was deceased or out of the country when KJ claimed it was transporting that person to medical appointments.  In other instances, the Medicaid recipient had never heard of KJ and had never taken any rides with the company.  In yet other instances, the Medicaid recipient had received unlawful “kickbacks” from defendants in exchange for either giving KJ his/her Medicaid information, or for fraudulently scheduling trips he/she did not take.
In hundreds of instances, defendants called Medicaid’s transportation management company for the New York City area and scheduled trips on behalf of Medicaid enrollees.  On these calls, the defendants tried to schedule reoccurring trips several times per week that would go on for months, allowing them to bill dozens of trips to Medicaid without having to schedule each trip individually.  In other instances, defendants scheduled trips online.  ABREU GIL attested to nearly all of the trips, fraudulently certifying that the trips actually took place when, in fact, most did not.
HECTOR SALAZAR HERRERA, 27, of the Bronx, New York, ZORAIDA GONZALEZ, 44, of Yonkers, New York, YESENIA RODRIGUEZ,  37, of Yonkers, JOSE RIVERA, 26, of the Bronx, FABIAN MORGAN, 39, of the Bronx, VICTORIA PALMA BREA, 32 of the Bronx, CRISTOPHER SANTOS FELIX, 28, of the Bronx, JOHN MANUEL MEJIA, 41, of the Bronx, JOSE JIMENZ HIDALGO, 42, of the Bronx, FRANCISCO SALAZAR, 68, of the Bronx, and NELSON DIAZ, a/k/a “Abdul Alamin,” 56, of the Bronx, acted as “drivers” or “recruiters” of Medicaid enrollees.  As detailed in the Complaint, the defendants variously paid Medicaid enrollees to schedule fraudulent trips, paid unlawful kickbacks to Medicaid enrollees, and fraudulently scheduled trips that never took place.  In exchange for their work, the “drivers” or “recruiters” were paid up to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
ABREU GIL, ALVARADO, GONZALEZ, RODRIGUEZ, RIVERA, MORGAN, PALMA BREA, MEJIA, JIMENEZ HIDALGO, SALAZAR, and DIAZ were arrested this morning and will be presented later today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger in Manhattan federal court.  SANTOS FELIX was already in federal custody on unrelated charges and will be presented at a later date.           
ABREU GIL, ALVARADO, SALAZAR HERRERA, GONZALEZ, RODRIGUEZ, RIVERA, MORGAN, PALMA BREA, SANTOS FELIX, MEJIA, JIMENZ HIDALGO, SALAZAR, and DIAZ are each charged with one count of submitting false claims, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287; one count of theft of government funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641; one count of aggravated identity theft, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 1028A; one count of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; one count of health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347; one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349; and one count of violating the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b.  In addition, ABREU GIL and ALVARADO are each charged with one count of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957.
The crime of submitting false claims carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison. The crimes of theft of government funds, health care fraud, money laundering, and violating the Anti-Kickback Statute each carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. The crime of wire fraud carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.  The crime of aggravated identity theft carries a mandatory two years in prison.  The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendants will be determined by a judge.
On February 14, 2020, law enforcement officers also executed seizure warrants in an effort to recover millions of dollars in fraud proceeds obtained by the defendants.
Mr. Berman praised the outstanding work of HSI, HHS-OIG, and OMIG.  He also thanked the City of Yonkers Police Department, the New York City Police Department, the New York Attorney General’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and United States Customs and Border Protection for their assistance in the case.
 [1] As the introductory phrase signifies, the entirety of the text of the Complaint and the description of the Complaint set forth herein are only allegations, and every fact described should be treated as an allegation.