Just Where Does Assemblyman Nelson Castro Live?

   That is the question Bronx Democrats are asking, as the Daily News reports that the Bronx Democratic Party is pulling out all the stops in backing 86th Assembly District Male District Leader Hector Ramirez including trying to yank current 86th Assemblyman Nelson Castro's Democratic Party registration on an issue of residency.

  Here's the link http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2010/08/bronx-dems-trying-to-nudge-ass.html

to read the whole story, Bronx Democratic County Leader Carl E. Heastie's reply to charges of using the new head of the Board of Elections to invalidate Assemblyman Castro's voter registration, and even the Board of Election notice of intent to cancel Castro's democratic registration.

   Kudos to Bob Kappstatter Daily News Bronx Bureau Chief on a great story.

J. Gustavo Rivera Expected to pick up Citywide Elected Officials Support

   It is being reported that 33rd State Senate candidate J. Gustavo Rivera will pick up endorsements from two citywide officials. It is expected that NYC Public Advocate Bill de Blasio and NYC Comptroller John Liu will endorse Gustavo Rivera against Senate Majority Leader Pedro Espada Jr. today.  

  This would be a significant  endorsement for candidate Rivera, as he has only picked up support of those mostly outside the senate district, with the exception of City Council members Cabrera, Koppell, and Palma.

  It should be noted that Senator Pedro Espada Jr. is expected to skip the two debates that have been set up for the candidates of the 33rd State Senate District.

Assemblywoman Rivera Refuses Debate With Giuffre

  Here is the press release from Robert Giuffre candidate for the 80th Assembly District, upon learning that 80th Assemblywoman Naomi Rivera will not debate him on Bronxtalk September 6th.
    Assemblywoman Naomi Rivera refused to debate challenger Robert Giuffre.  Gary Axelbank, host of the popular BronxTalk television program, announced the news yesterday (August 26, 2010) via press release.  The Giuffre campaign believes Mr Axelbank was 100% correct when he said:
    "This is yet another low in Bronx elected representation.  One would think that incumbents would be eager to boast of their records on the eve of a primary or at least feel a sense of responsibility to their constituents and the democratic process itself.  Unfortunately, that's not the case.  It's the height of arrogance and disrespect."
    The Giuffre campaign presses on with its grassroots effort to unseat the dysfunctional Assembly member. 

  

Friends of Rob Giuffre

Democrat for Assembly – District 80

GiuffreforAssembly.com

Contact: 347-538-6231

 

CARL PALADINO BREAKS BREAD WITH HISPANIC MINISTERS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS

   Senator Ruben Díaz Sr. who  is  also the President of the New York Hispanic Clergy Organization  and Pastor of the Christian Community Neighborhood Church in the  Bronx, welcomed Mr. Carl Paladino to the clergy breakfast at Maestro’s Caterer’s this morning. 

   According  to  Senator  Rubén Díaz, an invitation has been sent to New York Attorney  General  Andrew Cuomo  and to Mr. Rick Lazio also candidates for Governor  of the State of New York. “The purpose of this meeting is to hear their   responses  to  our  community  needs  such  as  Education,  Health, Employment, Housing and other issues. By doing this, our community will be educated  in their position and will have a better understanding regardless of their political parties,” stated Senator Díaz.

   Rev. Diaz said that every election candidates tell us how much they love us, what they will do for us, and that they want our votes, but after the election they are gone. "We are going to give all the candidates the courtesy to come and speak to us". 

   When Republican candidate for governor Carl Paladino arrived shortly after the start of the breakfast, Rev. Diaz told him "you are the only one of the three candidates for governor to give us the respect to show up here, and speak to us". "If the other two candidates won't respect us by showing up they must not want our vote". 

   Candidate Paladino said that he is a businessman, lawyer, and a  developer, who is running for office for the first time. "I am an outsider to Albany, I am the only anti abortion candidate, I am against gay marriage (as marriage is between a man and a woman he added), and I will fix what's wrong in Albany". Paladino added that he will go to Albany with a baseball bat (that bat being the voters he added) to bring back a government that will serve all the people. Paladino wants to lower spending by 20 percent, taxes by 10 percent, and create job expansion. Paladino said that Washington is a disgrace, and that Albany makes Washington look like a bunch of choir boys. 

   Rev. Diaz said to Paladino that we might agree on some issues and that they might disagree on some, but that you came to talk to us. Diaz said that the meeting was arraigned through the Bronx Republican Party County Leader Jay Savino (who could not attend due to business), and that Bronx Board of Election Commissioner J.C. Polanco stood in for Savino. 

   Rev. Diaz then ask Paladino "the papers say that you are anti hispanic, and want to put us all in jail". Paladino replied by saying that there are those who want to slow me down and call me a racist, but those who know me laugh at that. Paladino added that the public school system has failed all children, and that he was in favor of charter schools. Paladino continued to say that he would set up a system where people would have to choose to finish school, join the national guard, or go into fields of service such as forestry in rural areas, or in urban areas service to the cities. 

   When asked how people of color would play a role in the Paladino administration, the reply was that Paladino is color blind, and that people will be chosen by ability and not by color. When I asked one of Paladino's aides who came with him how many people of color are on the campaign staff, I was told out of the eight paid staffers-none, but some of the volunteers are. 

   When it came to the question of immigration Paladino said "children born here are citizens, but illeagal immigrants should be given a clear path to go back where they came from". 

    My question to candidate for governor Carl Paladino was what he thought about the recent test score uproar in New York State and New York City, and was he in favor of bi-lingual education in the schools? Paladino's answer was "I am not familiar with the recent test scores or bilingual education".

Living Wage Study: A Stalling Tactic

   EDC Hires Living Wage Opponents to Conduct Study

   The Living Wage NYC campaign announced today that it is condemning the city’s rigged living wage study. The study, which was recently announced by the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC), is being spearheaded by Charles River Associates, a management consulting firm based out of Boston. Economists David Neumark and Daniel Hamermesh, who are among the nation’s most vociferous opponents not just of living wage policies but even of the minimum wage, are part of the team.
   “The EDC could have selected a balanced team of experts to give New Yorkers a fair-minded assessment of living wage policies,” said Paul Sonn, policy co-director at the National Employment Law Project. “Instead, it is spending $1 million in taxpayer money to hire economists who are already on record as consistent critics of living wage and minimum wage policies, and who are affiliated with a lobbying arm of the restaurant industry.”

   Hamermesh and Neumark are both strong critics of minimum and living wage policies and have ties to Richard Berman’s Employment Policies Institute, a widely discredited pseudo think-tank, backed by the restaurant and beverage industry.  As exposed by the New York Times in June, the Employment Policies Institute is one of a group of sham, industry-backed “research” organizations established by Berman.  In addition to opposing minimum wage increases, Berman’s groups work to weaken drunk driving laws and promote sales of soda and candy in public schools.  See “Nonprofit Advocate Carves Out a For-Profit Niche,” New York Times, June 17, 2010.

   Neumark is the nation’s leading anti-living wage researcher.  Hamermesh has endorsed Neumark’s research and has been publicly critical of even modest increases in the minimum wage.  Neumark’s living wage research has been criticized by other economists as “neither methodologically sound nor statistically or substantively robust.”
   “Using consultants who have already made up their minds shows that the EDC is not concerned with the economic development of all New Yorkers but the economic development of rich developers and big businesses that are not interested in helping their workers live sustainable lives,” said Valery Jean, Executive Director of Families United for Racial & Economic Equality (FUREE). “The math is easy: to address the revenue crisis, you must provide living wages and health benefits for all.”

   The EDC’s study could hinder progress in enacting the Fair Wages for New Yorkers Act, which will guarantee that when the city gives businesses public subsidies, the jobs they create will pay at least a living wage. All workers employed at subsidized developments will be covered, including employees at retail stores located in subsidized shopping centers, concession workers at subsidized stadiums and cafeteria workers in subsidized office buildings.
   “At a moment when our city sits at the center of the foreclosure and unemployment crisis, Mayor Bloomberg has chosen to spend a million dollars of the city's money to commission a study on how paying a living wage to the poor might affect the non-poor,” said Reverend Dr. Peter Heltzel, Director of the Micah Institute at New York Theological Seminary. “The million dollars being spent on the study could turn 174 minimum-wage jobs into full-time living-wage jobs for a year. It's time for New York to step up to the plate and heed the cries of its impoverished workers.”

   More than 15 cities have enacted such legislation, and they have found that these policies create quality jobs for local residents without slowing growth. New York City is behind the times on this issue and, as a result, our publicly subsidized developments are keeping people in poverty-wage jobs, rather than providing them with opportunities to get ahead.
   Living Wage NYC Coalition partners (in formation): Community Voices Heard; Families United for Racial and Economic Equality; Fifth Ave. Committee; Fiscal Policy Institute; Good Old Lower East Side; The Greater NY Labor Religion Coalition; Jewish Labor Committee; Make the Road NY; Drum Major Institute for Public Policy; Pratt Area Community Council Leadership Group; New York Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church; The Micah Institute at New York Theological Seminary; National Employment Law Project; Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition; Northwest Bronx for Change; NY Communities for Change; New York Annual Converence of the United Methodist Church; NY Jobs with Justice & Urban Agenda; Pratt Area Community Council Leadership Group; Retail Action Project; Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU).

Labor Wonders About New Roosevelt's Lack of Involvemnt of Late

   It seems that after an early publicity campaign complete with a protest outside Senator Pedro Espada's home in Mamaroneck in June there are those who are involved now wondering where has the New Roosevelt Initiative been lately.
   Click the link below to see the whole story.
http://www.observer.com/2010/politics/labor-wonders-about-new-roosevelts

Bronx Community Board #4 to Announce Community Outreach Campaign

  

Who:                Bronx Community Board #4 & Community Leaders

What:               “Community That Cares” Campaign Announcement

Where:             Steps of the Bronx County Courthouse, 851 Grand Concourse, Bronx, NY

When:              Wednesday, August 25, 2010, 11 AM

Due to the on-going senseless violence throughout our neighborhoods Bronx Community Board #4 will announce their “Community That Cares” campaign, a positive initiative that will aggressively aim to “clean up” the graffiti, the guns, the gangs, our parks, our buildings, our blocks and our neighborhood!  We will organize a coalition of clergy, business and community leaders to address this matter.  Ours will be an ongoing campaign that enlists the public and private sector in promoting productive, positive persons that are committed to helping our community move forward. 

Term Limits Again Will Get Spot on Ballot

This comes from the Wall Street Journal about the term limit issue, and other items  voted on by the Charter Revision Commission.

   New York City voters will have the opportunity in November to restore a law that will cap elected officials' service at two consecutive four-year terms, but if they choose that option their decision will not fully take effect until 2021, a city panel decided Monday night.

Amid swirling controversy, the Charter Revision Commission voted to approve a so-called grandfather clause that allows all incumbents to serve a maximum of three four-year terms, even if the electorate decides on Nov. 2 to restore a cap on two terms.

   On the City Council, 32 of the 51 members are eligible to serve a third term and will benefit from the decision. Two newly elected citywide officials—Public Advocate Bill de Blasio and Comptroller John Liu—and two borough presidents—Scott Stringer of Manhattan and Ruben Diaz Jr. of the Bronx—also stand to benefit.

   Members of the commission, a 15-member panel appointed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, were bitterly divided on this issue of providing special dispensation to incumbents. The panel attempted twice Monday night to approve an alternative effective date for the term-limits measure, but those motions failed to win a majority of votes.

   Anthony Perez Cassino, a commission member who believed the will of the voters should be effective immediately, said the grandfathering of all incumbents is a "disservice" to the public to "make it so far into the future."

   Stephen Fiala, a commissioner who supported the grandfathering clause, called the move a "thoughtful and balanced solution."

   But many members of the public, who addressed the commission prior to the vote, voiced disdain for placing the effective date of the voters' decision so far into the future.

The public is "outraged by what's being done," said Henry Stern, a former city parks commissioner. "You are wronging the people of the city of New York."

  Several commission members acknowledged in their remarks that it was a difficult decision. Commission Chairman Matt Goldstein said the panel wasn't going to "solve" the term-limits issue, but he urged all the members to vote with "integrity."

   The commission considered and ultimately approved two yes or no questions to be placed on the Nov. 2 ballot.

   The first question asks voters whether they want to restore the cap on term-limits to two consecutive four-year terms—while protecting incumbents' ability to serve three terms—and a provision that would prohibit the council from altering the term-limits law in the future in any way that affects incumbents.

   The second question asks voters to decide on a slew of other issues, including campaign eligibility requirements, conflicts of interest, zoning procedures and more.

   Hope Cohen, a member of the commission, said she is disappointed so many issues are being bundled together, a result of the new electronic voting machines that make their debut in the city next month.

   "When you get 10 different subjects bundled together, there is a good possibility that you will like various items and not like various items," Ms. Cohen said in an interview. "It's unfortunate."

  The marquee issue on the ballot this fall will be the question on term limits. In 2008, Mr. Bloomberg persuaded the City Council to overturn a law capping elected officials service at two consecutive four-year terms, paving the way for his successful bid for a third term in the fall of 2009. Voters approved a two-term cap in two referendums in the 1990s.

   The mayor's and council's decision to overturn the law in 2008 fueled widespread voter anger, with some political observers saying it contributed to Mr. Bloomberg's narrow margin of victory a year later.

   Other issues expected to be placed on the ballot include: require public disclosure of expenditures made by entities and individuals independent from candidates to influence the outcome of a city election or referendum; reduce the number of petition signatures needed by candidates for city elective office to appear on a ballot; merge voter assistance functions, including a reconstituted Voter Assistance Advisory Committee, into the Campaign Finance Board; and change when Campaign Finance Board member terms begin.