This came in from the Joe Lhota for Mayor Campaign. Read the bold print that I highlighted. This endorsement seems to be less than flattering, and even states that the two are much alike. The big sticking point to me is that in a time when Madison Square Garden is negotiating a new deal with the city I do not like that Mr. Lhota was a top executive of Cablevison and MSG. Mayor Bloomberg gave enough of the city away to his friends.
Crain's New York Business today announced their endorsement of Joe Lhota for mayor of New York City.
Boiling down the two mayoral candidates to their basic experience and skill makes our choice clear.
Despite the candidates' rhetoric, picking the city's next mayor is not
about Bill de Blasio returning New York to its crime-ridden past or
Joseph Lhota implementing Tea Party policies. It's not even about their
actual goals, which are similar: Both men aim to address the struggles
of average New Yorkers, to stop punishing small businesses, to increase
the city's supply of affordable housing and to expand early-childhood
education.
Rather, New Yorkers should choose the candidate most capable of
fulfilling these ambitions in an unusually challenging fiscal
environment, judging by the latest battle in Washington. That depends
not on ideology or charisma, but on management skill and familiarity
with government. It also demands an understanding of the private
sector's role in supporting the many public services that help make New
York a global center of corporate might and entrepreneurial moxie. On
all those counts, Mr. Lhota is the superior choice.
A moderate Republican with a libertarian bent, Mr. Lhota has a résumé
tailor-made for the job. He was finance commissioner, budget director
and a deputy mayor in the 1990s, and knows city government down to its
granular details. Before his public service, he was an investment
banker, and after it, was a top executive at Cablevision and Madison
Square Garden. He then ran the Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
famously getting the world's largest transit system rolling again after
Superstorm Sandy.
Mr. Lhota, like all candidates, has shortcomings. He's not exactly
inspirational, which would be a nice quality for a mayor, though not
essential. While his ideas are good—such as dramatically increasing
teacher training and building affordable housing on unneeded Postal
Service and MTA properties—he hasn't offered enough big ones to capture
the public's imagination.
Yet his strengths more than compensate. The first function of the
city's CEO is to run its sprawling bureaucracy, and Mr. Lhota has the
ability and experience to do that exceptionally well. He would break
down the silos in which some city agencies reside, ensuring that they
work together and within a clear chain of command. At the same time, he
would not run roughshod over commissioners who understand their fields
far better than he does. Mr. Lhota possesses a refreshing combination of
competence and humility.
Mr. de Blasio also knows government well, having worked in it or with
it his entire career. But the Democrat's management experience is thin,
and he has not made a case for himself as chief executive. His economic
plan centers on business mandates—a dubious strategy—and his school
expansion depends on an unlikely tax increase, whereas Mr. Lhota would
fund prekindergarten expansion by finding budget efficiencies. That
exemplifies their differing philosophies.
For his breadth of knowledge, managerial expertise and mastery of city government, Crain's endorses Joseph Lhota for mayor.
No comments:
Post a Comment