WHISTLEBLOWERS WARN OF IMMINENT “COUP” AT BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS
Engel: BBG Must Not Become a Propaganda Outlet
Whistleblowers have informed Representative Eliot L. Engel, Ranking Member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, that the Trump Administration plans to circumvent the law and replace the top official at America’s international-broadcasting agency with a candidate who will steer American-funded journalism toward a pro-Trump bias. In a letter to the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which manages the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, and other entities, Rep. Engel relayed the whistleblower warnings and underscored that the law requires a new CEO to be confirmed by the Senate.
In his letter, Rep. Engel reminded the governors that under a 2016 change in the law, the next CEO of the BBG must be confirmed by the Senate and that the law allows current CEO John Lansing to remain in place until a successor is confirmed. Should Mr. Lansing depart before a Senate-confirmed successor is in place, it falls to the Board of Governors to choose an interim replacement.
Rep. Engel wrote, “the President can’t replace the CEO. He can’t appoint an interim replacement to fire the rest of you. And if Mr. Lansing leaves his position before a Senate-confirmed successor is in place, it’s up to the Board of Governors to appoint a new one. Congress wrote these laws. They must be followed. If the President wishes to put a new CEO in place, he should send a nomination to the Senate and await its advice and consent.”
Rep. Engel also relayed allegations about a plot by which two senior BBG officials and a White House personnel official are pushing for Mr. Lansing’s ouster by the end of the month and for the replacement of senior BBG journalists with individuals who will help advance the Trump Administration’s agenda—a clear violation of the statutory “firewall” separating BBG management and journalists.
Rep. Engel continued, “Such a scheme would represent a shocking abuse of authority and would reveal an effort by this Administration to turn the BBG into a propaganda machine.”
The full text of the letter follows and can be found here:
The Broadcasting Board of Governors
330 Independence Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20237
Dear Governors:
I must regrettably bring to your attention a serious allegation regarding the Broadcasting Board of Governors. I have learned from whistleblowers that the Trump Administration apparently intends to dismiss John Lansing as CEO of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) and appoint BBG Chief Technology Officer and acting Director of the Office of Cuba Broadcasting André Mendes as acting CEO. According to the whistleblowers, Mr. Mendes would then dismiss the existing Board of Governors. This action would violate current law and represent what these whistleblowers have described as “a coup at the BBG,” presumably with the aim of pushing the BBG’s journalism toward a viewpoint favorable of the Trump Administration. I view these claims as credible and this scenario as outrageous and unacceptable.
Mr. Lansing was appointed CEO by the Board of Governors in 2015, as appropriate under then-applicable law. Under legislation enacted in 2016, future BBG CEOs will be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. But the law states that until the Senate confirms a replacement CEO, “the current or acting Chief Executive Officer appointed by the Board may continue to serve” (22 U.S. Code § 6203). Congress’s intent when we passed this law was for the CEO to remain in place until the Senate confirmed his successor.
Furthermore, the current Board of Governors cannot be removed by the BBG CEO, and if Mr. Lansing departs before the Senate confirms a replacement, the Board will be responsible for appointing an acting CEO. While the 2016 changes ultimately dissolve the Board of Governors and replace it with an advisory body, until the Senate confirms a new CEO, the current governors remain in place and retain their statutory authority to choose the BBG’s leadership. At an April 2017 meeting of the Board of Governors, Chairman of the Board Kenneth Weinstein stated that the Board’s continuing authority was confirmed by a Justice Department memorandum. According to the meeting’s minutes, he told the Board that “the Department of Justice affirmed that the current Board is enduring and will continue to serve alongside the current CEO until a CEO is confirmed by the Senate and appointed by the President.”
In short: the President can’t replace the CEO. He can’t appoint an interim replacement to fire the rest of you. And if Mr. Lansing leaves his position before a Senate-confirmed successor is in place, it’s up to the Board of Governors to appoint a new one. Congress wrote these laws. They must be followed. If the President wishes to put a new CEO in place, he should send a nomination to the Senate and await its advice and consent.
According to individuals familiar with the proceedings, Mr. Mendes addressed a meeting of the Board of Governors on March 14, 2018 in advance of his planned March 30th departure from the BBG for another job at the Commerce Department. Mr. Mendes expressed his dissatisfaction that he was not made CEO during the last vacancy in 2015. He underscored his disagreements with BBG management under Mr. Lansing as well as with the heads of the various BBG entities.
I have learned from multiple sources that in fact, Mr. Mendes has been plotting with BBG Senior Advisor and former Breitbart contributor Jeffrey Shapiro and Associate Director of Presidential Personnel Jennifer Locetta to assume leadership of the agency prior to his announced departure. They have allegedly prepared a memorandum for the White House outlining this scheme and are pushing for Presidential action—contrary to law—to replace Mr. Lansing with Mr. Mendes before the end of the month.
According to several accounts, Messrs. Mendes and Shapiro have made it clear in recent months their intention to remake the BBG into an agency aimed at promoting the Trump Administration’s agenda, which would constitute an egregious violation of the law requiring a “firewall” between BBG’s management and its independent journalists. Such a scheme would represent a shocking abuse of authority and would reveal an effort by this Administration to turn the BBG into a propaganda machine.
Given the urgency of this situation and the potential harm it poses to American international broadcasting and national security interests, I ask that you furnish my staff by the end of the week with the memorandum outlining this plan, as well as minutes, notes, and any other documented recollections or relevant documents dealing with these matters.
I’m grateful for your service and for the good, unbiased journalism that the BBG’s various outlets produce. I intend to see that they continue. I ask you now to help me protect the integrity of American international broadcasting and resist any efforts to politicize these important institutions.
Sincerely,
ELIOT L. ENGEL
Ranking Member
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
CC: The Hon. Steve A. Linick, Inspector General for the U.S. Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors
Engel, House Dems Write to FCC Chairman Pai Urging Him to Protect Lifeline Program
Program provides access to phone and broadband services to over 13 million low-income Americans
Congressman Eliot Engel, a top member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, today joined Congresswoman Anna G. Eshoo, Congresswoman Yvette D. Clarke and over 60 other House members in writing Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai, urging him to protect the Lifeline program which provides access to phone and broadband services to over 13 million low-income Americans, the majority of whom earn less than $10,000 a year.
“From Day one of Ajit Pai’s term as FCC Chairman, the commission has done nothing but work to revoke key consumer protections,” Engel said. “Net neutrality, consumer privacy, and now the Lifeline program have all come under attack from this FCC and it’s the American people who are left to deal with the consequences. Lifeline helps millions of Americans each year. It must be preserved now and for future generations.”
The FCC recently voted 3 to 2 on party lines to proceed with a new proposal that will make it more difficult for eligible households to attain Lifeline’s services and will remove nearly 8 million current participants from the program. The FCC’s plan includes establishing caps on the Lifeline program, mandating co-pays from participants, and invalidating 4 out of 5 of the current providers of Lifeline services. The letter urges the Chairman to abandon this proposal and instead, move forward with reforms like the National Verifier, which ensures oversight of Lifeline.
“The Lifeline Program is essential for millions of Americans who use their devices to find jobs, schedule doctor’s appointments, complete their school assignments, call 9-1-1 during an emergency or to communicate with their loved ones,” the Members wrote.“Policymakers at all levels of government are united in their desire to close the digital divide, but the FCC should be strengthening Lifeline which has brought connectivity to millions of Americans.”
Since the program was created in 1985 under President Ronald Reagan, Lifeline has provided a discount on phone services for low-income consumers to ensure that all Americans have the opportunities and security that phone services bring, including being able to connect to jobs, family and emergency services.
The full text of the letter is below:
March 21, 2018
The Honorable Ajit V. Pai
Chairman
Federal Communications Commission
Dear Chairman Pai:
We urge you to abandon your plan to drastically cut back the congressionally-mandated Lifeline program that has successfully provided phone and internet services when people cannot afford them. We ask that you reconsider your plan to take this critical program away from 8.3 million struggling Americans.
The Lifeline Program is essential for millions of Americans who use their devices to find jobs, to schedule doctor’s appointments, to complete their school assignments, to interface with the government, or to stay in touch with their loved ones. The program helps Americans—including disproportionate numbers of veterans and people of color—help themselves.
The FCC recently proposed to exclude the majority of carriers from participating in the program and to arbitrarily cap the fund. While you have stated that you are aiming to curb waste, fraud, and abuse, experts have repeatedly testified that the sorts of measures you are proposing do not have a successful track record. Instead, these approaches merely force millions of otherwise qualified people to lose service. These measures could be especially brutal during periods of economic downturn when people need the most help.
If you are truly concerned about waste, fraud, and abuse, the Commission should work to accelerate the rollout of the National Verifier that would ensure centralized oversight of the program. Unlike your approach, the National Verifier has received widespread and bipartisan support. In fact, the Government Accountability Office has testified that the National Verifier will resolve most issues that may remain with the program without the same brutal side effects on low-income communities. Remarkably, among the comments filed by key stakeholders on the docket, we are not aware of any that fully embrace the Chairman’s proposal, and most urge substantial revision if not outright abandonment of the proceeding.
We therefore ask that you abandon this proceeding cutting the Lifeline program, and instead move forward with a full implementation of the 2016 reforms, including the expedition of the National Verifier. Policymakers at all levels of government are united in their desire to close the digital divide, but the last thing we should be doing is rolling back the policies that have brought connectivity to millions of Americans. This proposal is untimely, counterproductive, and actively undermines our shared goal of connecting everyone.
Sincerely,
ELIOT L. ENGEL
Ranking Member
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
No comments:
Post a Comment