Wednesday February 20, 2019 starting at 6 PM.
Please see below for information about NYC Charter Commission 2019’s upcoming expert forum on elections. This is the first of six forums where experts and advocates will testify about the Commission’s focus areas. This forum will focus on election-related topics like ranked-choice voting, redistricting, and campaign finance. Wednesday February 20, 2019 starting at 6 PM.
FOCUS AREAS
The Commission will study these proposals:
ELECTIONS
Instant Runoff Voting/Ranked Choice Voting
Proposals for the establishment of an instant runoff voting/ranked choice voting system (or
a similar system) and related election process reforms (e.g. elimination of duplicative
primary elections).
Redistricting
Proposals relating to how members of the Redistricting Commission are selected, who may
serve on such commission, and how district maps are drawn and adopted.
Campaign Finance
Proposals relating to the structure of the Campaign Finance Board (e.g. how members to
such board are appointed) and establishing an alternative public campaign financing
system, such as a “democracy voucher” system.
GOVERNANCE
Appointment and Removal of Officials
Proposals for establishing an “advice and consent” process for the appointment of certain
government officials (e.g. Corporation Counsel, certain commissioners) and for removing
such officials.
Borough Presidents and Borough-Level Governance
Proposals to expand and enhance the role of the Borough Presidents and/or borough-level
governance.
Corporation Counsel
Evaluate the role and accountability of the Corporation Counsel.
Corruption and Conflicts of Interest
Proposals relating to the structure of the Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) and lobbying
by certain officials after their public service has ended.
Police Accountability
Proposals relating to enhancing systems of police accountability. This will include exploring
improvements to the structure, powers, and role of the Civilian Complaint Review Board
(CCRB) and the manner in which police discipline is handled.
Public Advocate
Examine the role of the Public Advocate and consider proposals modifying, including
eliminating, the powers and responsibilities of that office.
Technical Changes to the Charter and Other Laws
Reconstituting the Board of Statutory Consolidation, whose purpose was to periodically
review the Charter and other laws with an eye toward reorganizing and simplifying those
laws.
Chief Diversity Officer
Proposal to create the position of Chief Diversity Officer in the Office of the Mayor and
each city agency.
FINANCE
City Budget - Proposals relating to
• The structure of the budget, including making budget units of appropriation more
detailed or program-based and aligning the capital budget with discrete projects
• The authority of the Council to establish terms and conditions on appropriations
• The timing of budget modifications concerning the financial plan
• Impoundment powers
• The timing and manner of making revenue estimates
Comprehensive Planning (Capital Budget Component)
Proposals relating to the development of a comprehensive city planning framework for
capital spending and land use. This would include consideration of proposals to restore
the Department of City Planning’s role in the capital budget process.
Independent Budgets for Certain Offices
Proposals relating to providing an independent budget (e.g., a guaranteed minimum level
of funding or ability to propose their own funding levels) for certain offices, such as the
Public Advocate or the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB).
Public Pension System Investments
Proposals relating to how public pension system investment decisions are made and by
whom.
Streamlining Procurement Payments
Explore ways to streamline the procurement process in order to ensure timely payments to
contractors and grantees (as well as timely access to capital funding), particularly for
nonprofit service providers. This would include an examination of the composition of the
Procurement Policy Board (PPB).
Contract Registration
Examine the contract registration process, including proposals for a mechanism to resolve
disputes between the Mayor and Comptroller with respect to approval/registration of a
given contract.
Procurement Policy
Proposals for a mechanism to establish procurement/contracting (and reimbursement)
policy objectives, including consideration of allowing or clarifying that such objectives can
be established by local law.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Planning (Land Use Component)
Proposals relating to the development of a comprehensive city planning framework for
capital spending and land use. This would include consideration of proposals for changes
to the composition of the City Planning Commission.
NOTE: This would accompany the “Comprehensive Planning (Capital Budget Component)”
topic included in the Finance bucket.
Franchising
Proposals relating to the composition of the Franchise and Concession Review
Committee , the manner in which the terms of franchises are established, the manner and
frequency of determining what franchises are necessary, and a mechanism for requiring
that needed franchises be implemented.
Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP)
Evaluation of ULURP, including consideration of proposals related to
• Establishing a “pre-ULURP” mechanism to allow involvement by communities,
Community Boards, Borough Presidents, and other relevant stakeholders earlier in
ULURP
• Allowing a Borough President to include an alternative application to be considered
alongside an application originating with the City or City-affiliated entities
• Exploring ways to ensure that necessary mitigation of development impacts occurs
• Clarifying ULURP timelines
• Examining the universe of projects covered by ULURP
• The manner in which ULURP modifications by the City Council and post-ULURP
modifications to existing approvals are administered
Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA)
Examine the composition of the BSA and its review of applications.
Landmarks Preservation Commission
Proposals relating to the composition and qualifications of, and possibility of
remuneration for, members of the Landmarks Preservation Commission.
No comments:
Post a Comment