Monday, June 29, 2020

Comptroller Stringer Calls on City to Provide Data on Remote Learning and a Detailed Roadmap to Reopen Schools


Stringer: “Make no mistake: if the City does not create a viable path forward for schools, those who suffer the most will be our most vulnerable children – lower-income students of color whose trajectories are most closely tied to the success or failure of the DOE’s promise to deliver a high-quality education to every child.”

  New York City Comptroller Scott M. Stringer sent a letter to Mayor Bill de Blasio and Department of Education (DOE) Chancellor Richard Carranza calling for concrete answers on the successes and failures of remote learning, the future of remote instruction, and a comprehensive reopening plan for schools ahead of the start of the next school year. With just 76 days until the first day of school, Comptroller Stringer outlined a broad range of unanswered questions that spotlight the urgency of communicating with parents about what school will look like in the fall, and how the City will ensure that every child receives a quality education. Comptroller Stringer noted that the DOE has yet to provide parents, students, and teachers with clear information on class structures for next year nor release a transparent assessment of remote learning during the last school year. The Comptroller’s letter highlighted the deep disparities in the quality and quantity of remote instruction across schools since March and the need for the City to provide concrete data and a comprehensive strategy to improve remote learning across the entire system going forward.
Comptroller Stringer also requested details from the City on any plans to:
  • Create staggered schedules, which would allow for social distancing by limiting the number of students who attend school each day while keeping others at home learning remotely. The DOE is actively exploring different scenarios but has made no final decisions on how schedules will be structured.
  • Offer support and professional development to teachers, especially to help strengthen remote learning strategies.
  • Address the digital divide through partnerships with internet service providers, which have provided free internet service through this school year to families in need but have yet to commit to extending such service through the summer and fall.
  • Provide principals with information about their school-based budgets, so that they can plan appropriately for the coming year. That information is normally provided to principals in May but to date has not been released by the DOE.
The full text of the letter can be found below and here.
Dear Mayor de Blasio and Chancellor Carranza:
As this unprecedented school year comes to a close, it’s hard not to feel both humbled and amazed by our city schools – by the extraordinary dedication of so many school employees, more than 70 of whom have tragically fallen to COVID-19 since March; by the parents, who overnight learned to become teachers and take on all the challenges of remote learning; and by the students, young and old, who had to adapt to a world turned upside down by the global pandemic. The perseverance of all involved has been nothing short of extraordinary. I saw this not just as a public official, but as a proud public school parent of two boys. That said, it is important also in this moment to take stock – of what has worked, and what has not – and to set a course for the future that is clear and fully informed by the lessons we have now learned. It is in that spirit that I write today to share my thoughts, and to seek both data and information from your office to help inform the complicated road ahead.
The urgency of the moment cannot be understated. There are just 76 days between now and the Thursday after Labor Day, when city school doors would traditionally open to students. And yet parents have no more information today about what schools will look like in the fall than they did last March, when schools closed. Of course, it is vital that the U.S. Senate step up and pass the HEROES Act, which would provide more than $90 billion for the nation’s schools. But federal inaction should not be an excuse for the DOE to stand still. As home to the nation’s largest school system, New York City should be setting an example for the rest of the nation by envisioning how schools might effectively open in the fall. We should be gathering the best minds from across the nation to think creatively about how to assure the safety of every student and staff member, how to strengthen remote learning, how to maximize our existing school spaces, and how to leverage every resource to help students make up academic ground they may have lost in the last three months. Instead, students and teachers alike have been left to wait, and hope, that details will soon be forthcoming.
Make no mistake: if the City does not create a viable path forward for schools, those who suffer the most will be our most vulnerable children – lower-income students of color whose trajectories are most closely tied to the success or failure of the DOE’s promise to deliver a high-quality education to every child. While well-off families may be able to supplement learning gaps with private resources, many communities will not have access to that kind of safety net. That’s why it is so important that every avenue be pursued to create school communities that are as robust and close to “normal” as possible, without sacrificing public health.
And yet to date there has been little official information as to what the city’s plans may be. All that has been acknowledged so far is that – to maintain social distancing – some kind of “blended” model of learning will be necessary in the fall, requiring students to split their time between hands-on learning in school, and remote learning from home. But within that basic framework are many gaping questions that the DOE has failed to answer in any meaningful way. Parents, for instance, have no idea what days their children will be at school and what days they will be home, much less what the school-day hours will be. Teachers have yet to be told what their class structures will look like, or when they should report to work. Principals don’t even know what their school budgets will be, even though that information is usually provided to school heads by May. While I can appreciate the complexities involved in making many of these decisions, there is no good reason why planning and preparation for the fall – as well as communication with parents and staff — is not more advanced.
I am also dismayed by the lack of concrete data that has been shared by the DOE around remote learning, which has been the only means of instruction for our entire school system in recent months, and which will remain a critical part of every school day in the city this fall. What seems obvious is that in the absence of citywide standards for remote learning, there have been deep disparities in the quality and quantity of remote, synchronous instruction across schools. Meanwhile, families that have been guiding their children in remote learning for months have grown frustrated, uncertain how to help as their children disengage, or even regress academically. For many, remote learning has been a true struggle, making it that much more urgent that the DOE assure families that no matter what form remote instruction takes in the coming school year, it will be improved in meaningful ways, with more direct support provided to families. At the same time, the DOE must establish clear, transparent, system-wide benchmarks for measuring academic progress at all schools. For example, all schools should have systems available to help identify students who are chronically absent, struggling academically or social-emotionally, or disengaging from learning, and target interventions to help them progress. For such tools to be effective, schools need access to actionable data.
To help inform ways to improve remote instruction, and to give parents the clarity they need to plan for the fall, and pursuant to my office’s authority under Chapter 5 of the City Charter, I hereby request the following information be provided by close of business on Friday, July 3, 2020:
Data on remote learning: To better understand how remote learning has played out across the City since last March and where improvements could be made, please provide the following information:
1. School-level interaction data, as recorded in STARS, representing the percentage of students who engaged with content on a daily basis;
2. School-level data, disaggregated by grade level and week, showing total unique student log-ins on remote learning platforms;
3. Data to describe school outreach in which contact was made with a student or that student’s parent or caregiver.
4. Details on DOE’s plan for establishing citywide standards for remote learning for attendance, synchronous instruction, and grading of student work. Specifically, as the City has recently agreed to require an hour and fifteen minutes of synchronous instruction during summer school, will such a requirement be in place for all schools in the fall?
5. Of all the students who requested a device to access the internet from DOE’s Central office, how many were successfully provided and how many students are still waiting to receive one?
6. What additional needs for internet-enabled devices do you anticipate having for the fall to support remote learning?
Plans for staggered schedules and blended learning: To maintain social distancing, it is clear that the DOE will be implementing some kind of staggered schedule for the fall, but parents have been given no clear guidance to date on what that will look like. For parents – especially those who work on an hourly basis and depend upon predictable schedules to make a living – this is vital information.
Many educators believe that double sessions each day – with half of all students going to school from 8 a.m. to noon, and the other half going from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m., with an hour in between for cleaning – would be preferable, as it keeps every child connected to school for at least some portion of the day and makes remote work more of a supplement, not the primary mode of learning for long stretches, and provides parents with some child-free hours every day. Others have advocated for sending children to school on alternate days, or even alternate weeks.
7. Please describe how schedules will be staggered in the fall. If no plans are currently available, please describe the options under consideration.
8. Will there be a single, citywide schedule for all schools, or will flexibility be granted to schools to devise their own schedules?
9. Will schedules, or the mix of remote/on-site instruction, be different for children of different age groups, i.e. in elementary, middle and high schools?
10. Will there be limits to class sizes, given the federal guidelines around social distancing for children, and if so what are they?
11. How does the DOE plan to staff classrooms in light of the expectation that up to 20 percent of teachers are considered high risk due to their age and cannot be required to attend school in person?
12. If requested, will parents who want to keep their children home be permitted to rely solely on remote learning to fulfill all educational requirements?
Professional development for teachers: Remote instruction is challenging. As it increasingly becomes the “new normal” for schools, it is important to identify the most effective ways to address those challenges. Many teachers would benefit from the opportunity to develop specific skills, either technical or instructional. This means that teaching staff will also need more dedicated time to focus on learning new tools and developing new skills. To provide more context on this, please provide the following:
13. What professional development does DOE plan to offer to teachers and school leaders that can specifically support technical skills or instructional skills in a remote environment?
14. What accommodations will be required to provide teachers the time needed to focus on developing these skills in collaboration with other educators from their school?
Internet access: The pandemic has heightened awareness of the vital importance of internet access for all New Yorkers, and especially students. And yet, nearly a third of all City households lack broadband internet access. These households are home to close to 2.2 million New Yorkers. The recent offers of free internet access from providers including Optimum and Spectrum have been a lifeline for many families, but as these temporary agreements expire, thousands of families with children attending summer school may lose connectivity if they cannot afford to sign up themselves.
15. What options have you explored for partnering with private providers to connect public school families to internet service over the summer and into next school year?
16. Is DOE collecting data on students’ internet access and, if so, what are the gaps that have been identified and how is the DOE working to address them?
School Budgeting: It is impossible for principals to plan for all these eventualities without a concrete budget that informs how much they can spend on staff and other critical school resources. Normally, principals know what their budgets will be by May and can begin planning, but to date the DOE has provided principals with limited clarity on their budgets.
17. What is the timeline for providing principals with their school-based budgets? We cannot demand that principals manage all these complexities without giving them the resources and information they need to get the job done.
As you know, this conversation about reopening schools is happening at a critical juncture for our democracy. New York City and the nation are engaged in a civil reckoning around class and race the depth of which has not been experienced in generations. It is worth noting, then, that nothing strengthens the values of our democracy better than the promise of a high-quality neighborhood public school – a place where the goal of learning is to ensure a more educated, informed society, where parents want to send their children, where teachers want to teach and develop their craft, and most importantly, where children grow into critical, independent thinkers, strong and confident in their ability to navigate an increasingly complex world. Thank you for your attention to these concerns and I look forward to your response.
Scott M. Stringer
New York City Comptroller

Sunday, June 28, 2020

What Happened At the Polls On Primary Day 2020


 It seems that the Board of Election underestimated the number of people that would come out and vote on Primary day 2020. In visiting many locations in different districts lines were inside some while at a few others the line went out the door at times. The one thing I saw seemed to be that there was at least one scanning machine less than normal at all poll sites I visited. I also noticed that several Election Districts were combined at one table, thus meaning there were less poll workers at each polling site. 

In speaking to poll workers I heard that the two page ballot was not explained to them correctly. A few sites had new Coordinators running them, which at one site I could only find one Coordinator who really didn't wanted to be bothered by anything. That Coordinator did not know what to do when poll workers asked a question. I reported this directly to the Board of Elections. I saw at one poll site candidate workers almost outside the entrance handing out palm cards. I could hear a police officer on his way back from lunch say "didn't I tell you that you had to be across the street"? There seemed to be an awful lot of Affidavit ballots at a table in one poll site. That was because it was a split poll site and the ballots from the second congressional district never were delivered so voters there had to use Affidavit ballots to vote. 

According to the Board of Elections website in the Bronx almost one-hundred thousand Absentee Ballots were mailed out to voters who requested them. As of June 26, 2020 only close to eighteen thousand have been returned, with a deadline of June 30, 2020. Mind you during the petition process when candidates claimed they received their hearing notices after the date of the hearing the answer from the BOE was that the BOE can not be responsible if the USPS can not deliver the mail on time. 

However the Board of Elections may have a bigger problem as it printed ballots before all the court cases were heard. It seems that Ruben Diaz backed candidates in the 79th and 87th assembly districts for party positions who were ruled off the ballot by the BOE were placed back on the ballot by the courts. One has to wonder why the BOE appealed that decision, while printing up absentee ballots and regular ballot with the names of the Diaz backed candidates. The appeal was upheld, and the candidates were ruled off the ballot again. I tried to ask Michael Ryan the head of the Board of Elections that question, or even the Chief Law Clerk for the BOE as I did with the candidates receiving notice of hearings after the hearing date. This time I was transferred  to Ms. Valerie Vazquez-Diaz the media contact at the BOE.  I said that I had a legal question about something, and told her about finding the names of candidates on the ballot that I thought were suppose to be off the ballot. After a while I called her back whereas she said the ballots were printed up before the appeal was decided. The BOE had placed the names on the ballot not knowing the outcome of the court case, and that since the candidates were ruled off the ballot that those ballots would not count if anyone voted for the candidates. 

In the 79th A.D. there was a full slate of party candidates down to Judicial Delegates, while in the 87th A,D, there were only two party positions with a slate of Judicial Delegates. In viewing the primary night results in the 79th A.D. twenty-three votes separate the first and second place Male District Leader candidates, and it is not known how many votes the Ruben Diaz backed candidate received who is not listed on the recap. Had that candidate not been on the ballot that may have changed the voting. This is also seen for Female District Leader, Male and Female State Committee members also since there is a small difference from the first and second place candidates that could be different if these candidates were not on the ballot. Also something to wonder is if any of the Diaz backed candidates received the highest amount of votes would that be considered a write in vote?

With all that happened on primary day 2020 one has to wonder who may have the best lawsuit against the Board of Elections. I have also been told by reliable sources that shortly after the votes are counted there will be certain people fired at the Bronx Board of Elections.



Above - People waiting on line outside a Parkchester poll site.
Below - Shows on the right side the names of Ruben Diaz backed candidates Barbara Brown (top), and Mohammed Mujumder at the bottom. 



Saturday, June 27, 2020

MAYOR DE BLASIO, COMMISSIONER BRANN ANNOUNCE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST 17 OFFICERS, INCLUDING FOUR SUSPENSIONS WITHOUT PAY, FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION INTO DEATH OF LAYLEEN POLANCO


The Department of Correction has now concluded its own internal investigation after the Bronx DA found no criminal activity following its six-month investigation 


  Following the conclusion of an internal investigation, Mayor de Blasio today announced that 17 uniform Department of Correction staff will be charged for their conduct surrounding the death of Layleen Polanco. Three officers and one captain will be suspended without pay immediately. This comes as the Bronx District Attorney filed no charges following their own six-month investigation into the circumstances surrounding Polanco’s death. 

“The death of Layleen Polanco was an incredibly painful moment for our city,” said Mayor Bill de Blasio. “What happened to Layleen was absolutely unacceptable and it is critical that there is accountability.”

"We are committed to ensuring that all of our facilities are safe and humane. Even one death in our custody is one too many and this swift and fair determination on internal discipline makes clear that the safety and well-being of people in our custody remains our top priority,” said Department of Correction Commissioner Cynthia Brann.
  

Michael Blake - Demand YOUR VOTE be counted




Sisters and Brothers,

This race is not over. This fight is not over. I cannot, in good conscience, concede at this time.
There are still roughly 43,000 absentee ballots that were mailed out that have not returned and/or been counted, and, we will not be satisfied with the outcome until every last ballot is counted, and every last voice was heard.

You know and feel the history that we share - too many of our sisters and brothers died to protect our right to vote. Too many people have marched. Too many people were beaten. Too many people gave their last breath to see the Voting Rights Act of 1965 become the law of the land. This is about our sacred right, that we have fought and died for, to vote.

Voting must be easy. Voting must be fair. Voting in this election was already difficult; people were made to either follow confusing and changing rules to vote from home, or they had the option of voting in person, potentially exposing themselves to the worst pandemic of our time. We cannot overlook the fact that intentional Black and Latino voter suppression exists, and it exists right here in The Bronx.

Voting was not easy on Tuesday nor throughout Absentee Voting, and it should have been. At Concourse Village, the largest polling site for Black voters in the 79th Assembly District, was moved with little notice, forcing confusion, and in many cases older residents gave up altogether. Many Bronx voters were forced to vote by Affidavit Ballot, because of confusion over something that should be simple. Their ballots are not counted immediately. In fact, we know that in one case, the number of affidavit ballots was so great that the ballot lockbox was impounded by police and taken to an unknown location. Other polling sites in Black neighborhoods were not open on time, forcing voters to wait as the temperatures climbed close to 90 degrees. This meant many voters gave up for health reasons. So many voters never even receive their requested absentee ballots, so many people wouldn’t vote to protect their health. There needs to be a better way.

Friends, I am not giving up, and you shouldn’t either. Voting is our Voice. I BELIEVE in the power of our VOICE. I BELIEVE that the City of New York and the State of New York must investigate voter suppression claims immediately. I BELIEVE that any person who the Board of Elections has in its system that requested an Absentee Ballot and didn’t receive it should be able to vote through an emergency action. Every person by law has to have equal access to voting, and it is the responsibility of the state to make these accommodations.
This fight is not over. We want justice at the polls, and we cannot stand down until I know that every ballot has been counted, and every voice has been heard. It’s not only my duty as a candidate, but my duty as a voter in the United States. Demand a fair fight. Demand a fair count. Demand a fair election.

Michael Blake, Candidate for Congress, NY-15

The Bronx Democratic Party - Statement from Chairman Marcos A. Crespo




Statement from The Bronx Democratic Party Chairman Marcos A. Crespo

“When I announced back in February my intentions not to seek re-election, I confirmed that I would finish the session calendar and see the Bronx Democratic Party through the primary elections. And now that the voters have spoken, I want to congratulate all the Democratic winners, wish them immense success in November and announce that I will step down as Chair of the Democratic Party in The Bronx to coincide with my official resignation as a Member of the NYS Assembly effective today.

I'm proud of all we have accomplished over the last five years thanks to the work of talented and committed staff and volunteers. We supported the election of young, dynamic, and diverse progressive elected officials. We made history with the first black female District Attorney in the state of New York. We also strengthened the judiciary by supporting and electing dozens of women of color to the bench. The Party has become more inclusive, and the community now has a more welcoming space for larger gatherings and political activities with our newly built out headquarters.

The Bronx continues to be the epicenter of tremendous growth and improvements, but much work remains. Our beloved borough still has an arduous road ahead to address the long-standing socioeconomic disparities that were so aggressively exposed with the COVID-19 pandemic. But I have full trust and faith in our voters, I believe they have made great choices in this election cycle, and I am certain that the collective wisdom and experience of these elected Democrats will steer the party into the future with success. 

Once again, to every colleague, District Leader, State Committee Member, community partner, financial supporter, Democratic voter, even our opponents, I say thank you for the opportunity to work together. The Bronx will always be my home, but I look forward to the next generation of leadership continuing the fight to uplift every resident and make life better every day for our great Borough.”

OPEN RESTAURANTS MEET OPEN STREETS: MAYOR DE BLASIO COMBINES POPULAR PROGRAMS TO EXPAND OUTDOOR DINING OPTIONS




Mayor de Blasio today combined two popular programs, Open Streets and Open Restaurants, by announcing expanded seating options for restaurants on select restaurant corridors throughout the five boroughs. By July 4th, 10-20 corridors citywide will be open to pedestrians and approved for expanded street dining. Another 10-20 corridors will be approved starting Friday, July 17th. Restaurants on these corridors will go farther away from the curb than other Open Restaurants participants, and the rest of the streets will be open to pedestrian traffic.

BIDs and community-based organizations can apply starting on DOT’s website starting Monday, June 29th. The City will quickly review applications and consult with elected officials and Community Boards to ensure optimal safety and appropriate design.

“New Yorkers have earned as much open space as we can give them – and combining our popular Open Streets and Open Restaurants programs will give them more options than ever,” said Mayor Bill de Blasio. “Restaurants will be invaluable partners as we fight back COVID-19 and rebuild our local economy, and we can’t wait to work with them throughout the reopening process.”

“Today’s announcement brings an exciting new opportunity for restaurants to expand their use of streets across the City — and reach even more customers,” said DOT Commissioner Polly Trottenberg. “With more than 5,000 Open Restaurants now signed up, some BIDs and neighborhood organizations have made a compelling case about the need to grow outdoor dining to even more of the street. But make no mistake, devoting entire streets to open-air dining is a big change — and we will make sure that these streets remain safe and passable for emergency vehicles.”

“New York City is defined by our creativity and innovation,” said Anne del Castillo, Commissioner of the Mayor’s Office of Media and Entertainment. “Expanding Open Streets to support our local restaurants and bars is a creative way to use our public spaces to help stabilize beloved businesses, and keep our city strong.”

“This is a great new model that really addresses all the needs to get New York back on its feet safely and still make room for a magical summer,” said Ariel Palitz, Senior Executive Director of the Office of Nightlife at the Mayor’s Office of Media and Entertainment. “We’re hearing it across the city, restaurants and residents are excited about the possibilities that come with expanding Open Streets and Open Restaurants.”

The first tranche of corridors, which will be open for street dining starting July 4th weekend, will focus on streets that are already participating in the Open Streets program and/or corridors with organizations that have worked with DOT on street closures in the past. The second tranche, which will be operational starting Friday, July 17th, will include additional applicants such as ad hoc groups of restaurants that coordinate through a single entity acting as a partner organization.

The hours of operation for this new expanded seating option for restaurants will be from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. on Friday nights, and noon to 11 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. Expanded seating will last until Labor Day.


NEW YORK CITY PREPARES FOR PHASE 3 OF RE-OPENING


  Mayor de Blasio announced additional guidance and assistance for businesses that can re-open in Phase 3, including personal care services and indoor dining. Because of the hard work of New Yorkers in flattening the curve and following health guidance, Phase 3 is  projected to begin on July 6th.   To protect workers and help businesses safely enter Phase 3, the City will also distribute an additional 2.5 million face coverings to businesses citywide.

"New Yorkers have shown incredible resilience during this crisis, and it’s because of their hard work that we are on track for Phase 3 on July 6th," said Mayor Bill de Blasio. "We are offering businesses across the City assistance so they can re-open safely and get New Yorkers back to work." 

HELP FOR WORKERS AND BUSINESSES

Guidelines for businesses reopening can be found here. Questions concerning reopening procedures should be directed to the City’s Small Business Services hotline at 888-SBS-4NYC. Over 17,000 calls have been made to the hotline so far. 

SBS has already distributed five million face coverings to business, and will continue to distribute 2.5 million more. If you are a small business with fewer than 100 employees looking to secure free face coverings for your employees, find a distribution site here.

Workers can call the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection at 311 or 1-212-436-0381 with questions about reopening, health and safety guidelines for the workplace, or to report an employer that is not following reopening requirements. 

Friday, June 26, 2020

BioReference Covid-19 Testing is Fraud - Do Not Get Tested By BioReference See Below Why. The DOI Needs to Investigate This.Fraud


I received this from BioReference telling me I did not have the COVID-19 test done that I scheduled. The test was was done on May 16, 2020.

Multilogos_BR_NYC

Dear New Yorker, 
Our records show that you previously signed up for a 
NYC COVID-19 antibody survey appointment but were 
unable to attend that appointment. The City is now 
scheduling appointments for five (5) new antibody 
survey sites starting on Friday, June 26, 2020.To sign 
up for an appointment, visit the link below.
Schedule Your Appointment
Regards, 
NYC & BioReference Laboratories
BioReference did a COVID-19 Anti Body test on me May 16, 2020 at its 3rd Avenue site in the Bronx, so why are they telling me I did not have the test done.
When I went to get my results four days after I had the test done, I would of had to agree to an agreement that included becoming a patient of BioReference, that BioReference could not keep your personal information secure since third parties are used and given the results of the test, that the agreement could be changed at any time, and there was a paragraph about payment of services. This tet is listed as costing $82.00 on BioReferences website.
I would not agree to BioReference's terms thus I did not get my result. 

Being a reporter who gets to question Mayor de Blasio, I asked him why I could not get the results, and what third parties are involved that receive ones personal information. 
I was told the third party is probably the Department of Health, and the mayor's office would assist in getting my result. 
The mayor's office failed at getting my test results, each attempt said I would have to agree to BioReference's terms, which I will not. 

Since it was mentioned that the Department of Health would be one of the third parties that receives my test results, I have sent a Freedom Of Information Letter to the NYC Department of Health for my BioReference test results. 

I had the test done at my doctors office recently and the test said I have plenty of anti bodies, which could be the reason I got over the Coronavirus quickly. I would still like to see how accurate the BioReference test results are.


Above - One of BioReferences employees checked you in at the entrance to the site.
Below - The area where my blood was drawn for the COVID-19 test. 


These photos are proof that I had the test done, so why is BioReference saying I didn't? For another $82.00?