Wednesday, May 14, 2025

What is 13th Cit y Council Candidate Shirley Aldebol Hiding on Her Campaign Finance Board Expenses, Where Did the Money Go?

 

HyperLink

Aldebol, Shirley (2025)
City Council District 13


Candidate: Expenditures - Follow the Money | NYC 

Stripe – Contribute Aldebol, Shirley City Council (2025 ) 2/28/2025 $133.77  

Stripe – Contribute Aldebol, ShirleyCity Council (2025 ) 1/31/2025 $230.84 

Stripe – Contribute Aldebol, Shirley City Council (2025 ) 12/31/2024 $80.87 

Stripe – Contribute Aldebol, Shirley City Council (2025 ) 11/30/2024 $74.79 

Showing 1 to 4 of 4 entries  $527.27


Where did the other $8,180.73 go Candidate Shirley Aldebol that is not accounted for?

COIB SETTLEMENT WITH FORMER MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO

 




After three years of litigation, the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (the “Board”) has reached a settlement with former Mayor Bill de Blasio to resolve his violations of the City’s conflicts of interest law in connection with his 2019 presidential campaign. As part of the settlement, de Blasio will pay the City a total of $329,794.20 in restitution and fines; de Blasio has already paid $100,000 of this sum to the Board.

 

  • Violations: During his presidential campaign, de Blasio had the City pay the travel expenses for his NYPD security detail to accompany him or his spouse on 31 out-of-state campaign trips, despite having been previously advised by the Board in advance and in writing that the City could not pay for such expenses. The security detail incurred $319,794.20 in travel costs, excluding salary and overtime, during these trips.
  • Procedural History: On April 14, 2022, the Board commenced an enforcement action against de Blasio. The Board’s charges were adjudicated at a hearing at the New York City Office of Trials and Hearings (“OATH”); OATH issued a Report and Recommendation on May 4, 2023, finding that de Blasio had committed the charged violations. On June 15, 2023, the Board ordered de Blasio to repay the City $319,794.20 and imposed a fine of $155,000 (adopting the reimbursement and fine amounts recommended in the OATH Report and Recommendation). The same day the Board issued its Order, de Blasio filed an Article 78 Petition in New York State Supreme Court challenging the Board Order. On January 13, 2025, that Article 78 Petition was dismissed, and on January 29, 2025, de Blasio appealed that decision.
  • Settlement: In the attached Stipulation of Settlement, de Blasio agrees to withdraw his appeal of the dismissal of his Article 78 Petition. He also acknowledges that he violated the City’s conflicts of interest law, that he deeply regrets his conduct, and that he no longer challenges the Board’s factual findings and legal conclusions. In addition to the $100,000 he has already paid, de Blasio agrees to pay an additional $229,794.20 in quarterly installments over the next four years.

This settlement brings to a successful conclusion the first ever enforcement action brought by the Board against a Mayor of the City of New York. The Board acknowledges and is grateful to the New York City Department of Investigation for its extensive investigative work, which was critical to this successful resolution.


MAYOR ADAMS CELEBRATES PROGRESS CLOSING ILLEGAL SMOKE SHOPS, TURNING VACANT STOREFRONTS INTO LEGAL, SMALL BUSINESSES

 

Since Launching in May 2024, “Operation Padlock to Protect” Has Sealed Nearly 1,400 Illegal Cannabis Businesses, Seized Over $95 Million in Illegal Products 

Adams Administration Unveils Next Steps for Re-Opening Previously Padlocked Businesses as Legal Stores

Effort Builds on Record Number of Jobs and Small Businesses Achieved Under Adams Administration

New York City Mayor Eric Adams today touted significant progress shutting down illegal smoke shops since he launched “Operation Padlock to Protect” last year and announced next steps for re-opening shuttered storefronts as safe, legal businesses. After successfully securing authority from Albany to shut down illegal smoke shops in 2024, Mayor Adams launched Operation Padlock to Protect and empowered the New York City Sheriff’s Office and the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) to padlock shops illicitly selling cannabis without a license. Since May 2024, the city has shut down nearly 1,400 shops and seized over $95 million in illegal products from illicit stores. As the city recently passed the one-year mark of Operation Padlock to Protect, the Adams administration will begin working with landlords to re-open previously sealed and vacant stores, allowing them to either apply to operate as a legal cannabis store or a different type of business altogether. The Adams administration will work to fill vacant storefronts as they are unsealed and build on the record number of small businesses reached under the Adams administration.

“This time last year, there were thousands of illegal smoke shops plaguing our city with unlicensed cannabis endangering our children. One year later, we are proud to announce that we have turned the tide. Thanks to the tireless efforts by our city’s law enforcement officers, we’ve padlocked thousands of illegal shops and created safer streets for children and families,” said Mayor Adams. “But we’re not stopping there. The next step of our plan is to work with property owners to safely and legally re-open their vacant storefronts, replacing illegal smoke shops with pizzerias, bakeries, barber shops, retail stores, and other legal establishments. These businesses will help revitalize neighborhoods and help grow our record number of small businesses even higher. This is what it looks like when government comes together to solve real problems and create a safer, more affordable city for all New Yorkers.”

“Thanks to Mayor Adams and our administration, ‘Operation Padlock to Protect’ has removed millions of dangerous, illegal cannabis products from our neighborhoods and from the hands of the youth of our communities,” said New York City Sheriff Anthony Miranda. “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners and fellow agencies to padlock illegal smoke shops, monitor storefronts as they are unsealed, and ensure that illegal smoke shops remain out of business.”

“As previously padlocked storefronts are unsealed, SBS is excited to help fill them with new small businesses across all industries, including legal cannabis,” said New York City Department of Small Business Services (SBS) Commissioner Dynishal Gross. “‘Operation Padlock to Protect’ has not only been a success for public safety, but for the legal small businesses that will fill these storefronts and for the legitimate cannabis industry. With 160 licensed dispensaries now open, more than 1,400 consultations delivered, and over $500,000 in monies disbursed through our loan fund, SBS’ Cannabis NYC program is providing the hands-on support, training, and capital that entrepreneurs need to succeed — all while driving job creation and advancing our city’s economic recovery.”

Since launching in May 2024, Operation Padlock to Protect has systematically conducted joint operations — which include inspections and follow-up inspections — in neighborhoods across the five boroughs. When illegal stores are ordered to be sealed, officers from local New York City Police Department precincts monitor those locations to ensure compliance and alert the Sheriff’s Office when violations of the seal order occur.

Record-high closures of illegal smoke shops have won widespread praise by New Yorkers who have applauded the Adams administration for taking decisive action on this public-safety and quality-of-life nuisance. Operation Padlock to Protect is another example of the Adams administration's efforts to double down on its commitment to swiftly shut down illegal operators, protect the city’s children, improve quality of life, and facilitate a safe and thriving legal cannabis market. 

The Adams administration is also working to re-open shuttered storefronts as legal businesses. New York City is legally allowed to padlock storefronts for up to one year following a closure due to the sale of illegal product; as the city reaches the one-year mark of Operation Padlock to Protect, the New York City Sheriff’s Office will be working with landlords to unseal their properties and allow them to re-open with a new, legal business in their place. The city is notifying property owners of their next steps and urging them to contact the New York City Sheriff’s Office at (718) 707-2100 or email SmokeShopRelease@nyc.gov to schedule an appointment. The New York City Department of Finance will be mailing letters to the building owners and businesses with a secure code to present to the New York City Sheriff’s Office with detailed instructions.  

In addition to closing illegal smoke shops to keep New Yorkers safe, the Adams administration has helped create a thriving legal cannabis industry as well through the launch of Cannabis NYC. Cannabis NYC has already engaged over 6,000 New Yorkers interested in the cannabis industry on its five-borough “Lift Off! Cannabis NYC” public education, listening, and outreach tour and over 200 New Yorkers have participated in the FastTrac for Cannabis Entrepreneurs sessions, which connect legal cannabis business owners and entrepreneurs with free, high-quality training and advice delivered by leading voices in the legal cannabis industry. Additionally, SBS’ NYC Business Solutions Centers offers free business courses, consultations, hiring assistance, and more through their cannabis account managers. SBS has provided over 1,400 cannabis consultations through the Business Solutions Centers network.

Legal cannabis sales in New York City topped $350 million last year alone and 160 legal, adult-use cannabis dispensaries have now opened across the five boroughs as of April 2025. These milestones come as the city’s landmark Cannabis NYC Loan Fund — which was launched in October 2024 in partnership with the New York City Economic Development Corporation — has disbursed $500,000 of its initial $2 million tranche to support early-stage cannabis businesses.

To bolster legal cannabis businesses even further and ensure equitable access to capital, the Cannabis NYC Loan Fund provides Conditional Adult-Use Retail Dispensary (CAURD) licensees with flexible loans of up to $100,000. There is no application fee, no minimum credit score, and a 36-month repayment period. The fund — administered by the cannabis-focused private equity firm Tuatara Capital — is once again open to applications from CAURD licensees to help cover the costs of start-up and ongoing operating expenses. Additionally, SBS provides support with commercial lease negotiations, permitting, and licensing through the NYC Business Express Service Team, and the NYC LEASE initiative helps to connect dispensary licensees with viable storefronts and education about state regulations.

“I was proud to lead the fight against illegal smoke shops by passing the SMOKEOUT Act last year. My bill equipped the Sheriff and DCWP with enforcement power, allowing them to close illegal smoke shops across the city with ‘Operation Padlock to Protect,’” said New York State Assemblymember Jenifer Rajkumar. “In a year, they shuttered 1,400 shops that were attracting crime, selling to children, and sapping revenue from legal dispensaries. As we celebrate the success of Padlock to Protect on its first anniversary, we begin the process of reopening storefronts, allowing lawful businesses to grow and thrive. Together, we will embrace a future free of illegal smoke shops and full of vibrant commercial activity on every street.”

Attorney General James Sues U.S. Department of Homeland Security to Protect Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Relief Funding

 

DHS Threatens to Withhold Counterterrorism, Emergency Response, and Disaster Relief Funding from States That Refuse to Support the Administration’s Mass Deportation Agenda
AG James and Coalition Seek Order Blocking Unlawful Conditions on DHS Funding

New York Attorney General Letitia James and 19 other attorneys general filed a lawsuit to block new U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) conditions that unlawfully tie emergency management and disaster relief funding to state immigration enforcement actions. Since January, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and other administration officials have engaged in a concerted, coordinated effort to pressure states to assist with the administration’s mass deportation agenda. Now, Secretary Noem has given states an ultimatum: cooperate with the administration on civil immigration enforcement or lose out on essential funding for emergency preparedness and disaster response efforts. Attorney General James and the coalition argue that DHS’s attempt to use federal funds as leverage to compel state immigration action violates the Constitution and puts communities at risk. The attorneys general are seeking a court order declaring these conditions unlawful and protecting states’ access to life-saving emergency management funds.

“DHS is holding states hostage by forcing them to choose between disaster preparedness and enabling the administration’s illegal and chaotic immigration agenda,” said Attorney General James. “This funding is vital to keeping New Yorkers safe during hurricanes, floods, and other catastrophes. The federal government cannot weaponize disaster relief to coerce states into abandoning public safety and community trust. My office will fight to ensure all New Yorkers are protected – both from tragic disasters and from cruel and unnecessary immigration policies.”

In recent months, DHS has imposed sweeping new requirements on its grant programs, mandating that states divert law enforcement resources to support federal civil immigration enforcement or risk losing billions of dollars in funding for emergency preparedness, disaster relief, and cybersecurity. States have also been ordered to immediately halt any program that “benefits” undocumented immigrants or “incentivizes” illegal immigration. Attorney General James and the coalition assert that DHS has no legal basis to withhold critical emergency funding and cannot lawfully force states to choose between disaster preparedness and long-standing public safety policies that build trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities.

The attorneys general argue that the at-risk funding was authorized by Congress to mitigate, prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters, not to enforce federal immigration policies. These grants fund essential emergency operations, including first responder salaries, training programs, and building improvements to protect houses of worship and schools from malicious attacks. They support search and rescue missions, food aid, and recovery efforts after major disasters. The attorneys general highlight that many of the grant programs at risk were created in response to national emergencies like the September 11 attacks and Hurricane Katrina, including:

  • State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), which was established after 9/11 to support state counterterrorism and emergency preparedness efforts, including the creation of bomb squads, SWAT teams, and hazmat units;
  • Urban Area Security Initiative, which was also established after 9/11 to fund cities’ counterterrorism and emergency response efforts;
  • Emergency Management Performance Grant Program, which was established after 9/11 and made permanent after Hurricane Katrina to strengthen state and local emergency management;
  • State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, which was created after COVID-19 to protect from cyberattacks; and
  • Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP), which was created in 2004 to protect nonprofits and faith-based organizations from extremist attacks.

New York received $44 million in NSGP funding last year, much of which was allocated to religious institutions and private schools at high risk of extremist violence. This funding, which in particular helps protect synagogues and Jewish day schools facing antisemitic violence, supports measures like security systems, metal detectors, and impact-resistant building upgrades. Attorney General James and the coalition argue that cutting NSGP funding would endanger vulnerable communities during a period of heightened extremist threats, especially because nonprofit organizations generally lack other funding sources for such improvements.

Disaster response funds and programs, which states rely on to rebuild communities after major natural or mass casualty events, are also at risk, including:

  • Public Assistance Program, which supports emergency work in the immediate aftermath of disasters, from debris removal to temporary shelter construction;
  • National Urban Search & Rescue Response System, which funds around-the-clock search and rescue operations;
  • Disaster Case Management, which provides recovery planning for disaster survivors;
  • Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, which assists with rebuilding in a way that reduces future risks; and
  • Flood Mitigation Assistance Grants, which reduce flood damage risks in coastal communities.

Also at risk are Fire Management Assistant Grants, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction, National Dam Safety Program, National Flood Insurance Program Community Assistance Grants, Port Security Grants, State Recreational Boating Safety Grants, and grants to participate in the FEMA Flood Mapping program.

New York in particular stands to lose hundreds of millions of dollars in emergency preparedness funding under DHS’s new conditions, including resources for certified bomb squads, the New York State Intelligence Center, SWAT teams, and hazmat units. Additionally, New York relies on DHS grants for more than $30 billion in FEMA Public Assistance funding, which has been critical in responding to disasters like Superstorm Sandy, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the 2024 tornadoes and flooding in Upstate New York.

Attorney General James and the coalition argue that DHS is presenting states with an impossible choice. Either they forego the millions of dollars in federal funds that Congress has appropriated – and which their emergency preparedness and response efforts rely on – or they undermine their law-enforcement efforts by diverting their resources to enforce federal immigration law. More critically, accepting these unlawful terms would destroy the trust that many states have worked hard to build between immigrant communities and law enforcement, threatening the public safety of all residents who rely on law enforcement’s ability to solve crimes and bring culprits to justice.

The attorneys general contend that DHS is unlawfully using federal funds to coerce states into adhering to the administration’s civil immigration enforcement policies – exceeding the grant programs’ scope and violating constitutional limits on executive power. The attorneys general are asking the court to declare these conditions unlawful and block DHS and the federal government from using vital emergency funds as leverage to enforce immigration policies.

Joining Attorney General James in filing this lawsuit are the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, Wisconsin, and Vermont.

Comptroller Lander Casts Protest Votes Against Wells Fargo, Citibank, JP Morgan Chase’s Banking Designations

 

Lander calls on banks holding New York City’s deposits not to capitulate to Trump’s attacks on climate, DEI and civil rights

As Donald Trump and his allies escalate their attacks on climate action, DEI, and civil rights, the Comptroller’s Office voted against the designations of Wells Fargo, Citibank, and JP Morgan Chase during today’s New York City Banking Commission designation vote.  

“The banks that hold New York City’s deposits should adhere to the rule of law and New York City’s core values. They should not yield to Donald Trump’s far-right, discriminatory, anti-climate, anti-DEI agenda,” said Comptroller Brad Lander. “Last week, at the first ever standalone public hearing of the Banking Commission, New Yorkers offered powerful testimony about the harms these banks caused in accelerating the climate crisis, widening the racial wealth gap, and discriminating against New Yorkers. Rather than rewarding them, as the Adams Administration is doing with today’s designations, New York City should demand better from these banks—to advance community reinvestment, combat discrimination, support climate action, and serve all New Yorkers fairly.”  

Additionally, the Comptroller’s Office voted against the designation of Flagstar and Ridgewood bank citing poor credit ratings and testimony from New York City tenants who experienced landlord harassment and negligence in buildings financed by these institutions.  

The Banking Commission approved the designation of all five banks over the Comptroller’s objections and calls to invoke the necessity exemption to conditionally designate. The Adams administration’s votes granted these banks the authority to hold City funds despite the banks’ continued investments and policies that undermine climate action, affordable housing, and civil rights, and in defiance of overwhelming public testimony opposing their designation.  

The New York City Banking Commission is a three-member body composed of the Mayor, the Comptroller, and the Commissioner of the Department of Finance responsible for approving which banks are eligible to hold City deposits. The Commission’s vote will grant 31 banks the authority to hold City funds and receive new City accounts for services like payroll, vendor payments, and agency deposits. Under the Charter and the Rules of the NYC Banking Commission, to comply with designation requirements a bank must file certificates concerning its policies of non-discrimination in hiring, promotion, and delivery of banking services, and for bank closings.  

Today’s vote takes place one week after the Banking Commission’s first-ever standalone public hearing, where dozens of New Yorkers testified powerfully about the harmful roles these banks continue to play in the city, including investments and policies that accelerate the climate crisis, fund some of the city’s worst landlords, and deepen the city’s racial wealth gap. The stand-alone hearing builds on the reforms advanced by Comptroller Lander’s administration to improve the Banking Commission’s transparency and accountability.  

Climate Action 

The Comptroller voted against designating Wells Fargo and Citibank for caving to Trump’s anti-climate agenda. In February shortly after Trump took office, Wells Fargo became the first and only major U.S. bank to abandon its pledge to reach net-zero financed emissions by 2050. Wells Fargo scrapped its sector-specific interim emissions targets for 2030. The bank abdicated its responsibility to stop the climate crisis, claiming that the actions needed to achieve a just transition to clean energy are outside of its control—all while pouring $300 billion into fossil fuel projects that contribute to climate collapse.  

Citibank has come under fire for unlawfully withholding $20 billion of Congressionally approved Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds for clean energy. Citibank locked out clean energy nonprofits grantees from accessing lawfully awarded funds without providing any justification for doing so. Now the bank is the defendant in multiple lawsuits for violating its contract. Comptroller Lander voted against Citibank’s designation to hold it accountable for prioritizing Trump’s agenda over the bank’s contractual obligations.  

“Over the past decade, Wells Fargo has been involved in multiple high-profile scandals and regulatory actions. These crimes alone should make Wells ineligible to be a designated NYC bank, and laughably so. But even more damaging—and most important for us in Third Act, who are terrified about the kind of world we are on track to leave our grandchildren, especially here in NYC, which is significantly vulnerable to climate change impacts —is Wells’ contribution to the climate crisis. On February 28, 2025, Wells Fargo became the first major U.S. bank to abandon its 2030 and 2050 climate targets. In addition, between 2016 and 2023 Wells Fargo provided almost $300 billion to the coal, oil, and gas companies driving the climate crisis. The bank is a totally inappropriate partner for the City of New York and our Comptroller’s Office, has shown the world what real climate leadership looks like,” said Sheldon Pollock, Third Act NYC.   

Civil Rights 

The Comptroller also voted against the designation of J.P. Morgan Chase Bank after receiving troubling testimony about Muslim and Arab New Yorkers’ experiences of discrimination, ultimately voting against the designation of J.P. Morgan Chase, which holds the City’s payroll accounts. 

Comptroller Lander continued, “New York City has the most expansive anti-discrimination laws in the country and it is incumbent upon banks that hold City deposits to adhere to the spirit and letter of the law. Anything less falls short of the requirements for designation under Title 22 of the Rules of the City of New York.” 

Tenant Rights  

Comptroller Lander also voted against the designation of Flagstar Bank and Ridgewood Savings Bank, following testimony from tenants experiencing harassment and neglect from landlords financed by these institutions. In addition, Flagstar Bank held the worst credit rating of any applicant. 

Read Deputy Comptroller Annie Levers’ full remarks here: https://comptroller.nyc.gov/newsroom/testimonies/deputy-comptroller-for-policy-annie-levers-delivers-remarks-at-the-nyc-banking-commission-designation-vote/